Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
@OP That is not what Tags are for, there to help you find something, not, not to find it
Low resolution textures and low polygon counts on a high resolution, 40" screen look terrible...
This is highly relevant for large screen users
They are great games, on PC on Mobile, were it was released honestly dose not matter, while its made well
Many mobile games are made to work with a touch screen, so ya on PC they may not work as well if you do not have a touch screen, but saying that a game been released on mobile mean its bad
Or that a game not been released with publisher is bad, is just too general
A mobile tag would be great even if Game Developers dont like it.
A game writen for an ARM chip and a game that is writen for a desktop processor are two different things. Upscaling something from ARM should not be hidden from the people that buy the games.
I play old school games on my machine too and I know they are low res. If I buy a game from steam I want to know if when I max out the graphics it looks good.
I go by how the OP specifies those mobile games. As games homegrown on mobile platforms, such as Angry Birds for instance. Not Pong or Pacman, or games that were homegrown on consoles or arcades. I'm just saying that these mobile games somehow, most of the time, are better than the indies that are praised for absolutely no reason other than executing new ideas (in a boring fashion). Of course not all indies suffer the same fate, some are absolutely good, but I consider the majority a junk.
Usually touch screen games made to work on a Windows PC will have support for the keyboard and mouse, apart from a few select games on the Windows Store (they will mention they need touch screen in the description), so they would work well despite their origin. What matters is, I'd rather the loss in resolution (helps that I'm not a guy obsessed with squeezing out my PC's power till it becomes a dead horse) over a full-res indie game that is absolutely not fun.
Any how i think we need to get to the topic of mobile and leave indie out
Nope. But at least the AAA has the chance to execute its ideas right, as boring as they are, and make a fun experience, unless the AAA in question was left unpatched.
Yes, indeed, but he has to remember that the mobile games he's so ditching are still better than most options for cheap games...