Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
right there. that last sentence in the quote I made from you. bad comment given your comment above it.
bad move
That's not critique. That's stating a fact that my suggestion is based on. What's with the hostility?
To allow to filter the to the currect stage reviews, also while the game is in Early Access
And also after
As just as a game left Early Access it dose not have to stop updating, also why only Early Access? it can be all games, of all types i think that it can be good for
seen a few times games with "Mostly Negative" Reviews or the like, with the top postive starting with something like "Many bad reviews for these games do so as these or that were missing, but it was fixed now"
So when the game got update i think will be good to be yet able to see the current Verizon review for all games
I agree with you on this. This could be useful. The filtering could be tied to the latest patch so you could filter out any reviews that were written or updated before the patch.
However, you should also be able to see all the reviews if you want. This prevents the developers from "resetting" the reviews by issuing mindlessly small patches.
The filters could include "all reviews", "no Early Access reviews", "only reviews since the latest patch", or something along those lines.
because what you stated is not a fact its highly debateable with your use of the word 'many'.
you say your not wanting to argue but then the very next thing you do is build a frame to do exactly as you claim you arent
That is a valid point. That is why I am suggesting this.
Have I offended you in some way? I am not arguing about Early Access as a practice in any way. You can change what I said to "some games" or "a few games" inside your head and think about it like that if you want. If you claim that no game has had any problems during its period in Early Access, I am baffled. However, I am still not here to argue about whether that is true or not and to what extent.
Do you have a problem with my suggestion or the way that I presented it? I am not a native speaker so I apologize for anything that feels unclear to you. I hope that the paragraph above this one has clarified my suggestion.
My point still remains. If I so desired, I would like to be able to filter out reviews that may not be representative of the product at the moment. So basically any reviews before a certain point.
Actually, my suggestion could be modified so that you could actually filter out reviews based on date. So, you could filter out any reviews written or last updated, for example, before the full release or the latest patch.
EDIT: Just to make it clear, I own a few Early Access games that I have enjoyed so far. So I got no problem with Early Access itself.