Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Just because they would be from Steam doesn't mean they will be less laggy. It all depends on where the servers are to your location.
The Steam "console" is pretty much just a computer with a specialized linux OS on it. You could wipe them and put on windows and it would work just fine. Its not even steam making them, they are all 3rd party venders with steam putting their stamp on them.
Also think about this, if you rent from a 3rd party host, you usually have your choice of where servers are so if its laggy, tell them to move it to another server or go rent somewhere else. If you have any issues you always respond very very quickly. Steam has 300 people and not very many of them do steam support. Think how long it would take for them to reply with issues you are having. Usually with a hosting issue you need a response in minutes or hours and not weeks.
I see the rent a server as a step further into that market...
steam could provide cheap servers for established games easily modded with safe steam supported mods... and just because you have never picked up a virus from a mod makes all mods virus free? no... reason i say they would be safe is because steam will not allow a mod if its got a virus...
I feel this would be a smarter investment than steam starting its own line of computers/consoles whatever that in todays market are pretty much guaranteed to fail...
the specs on these new console/computers arent even that good and they want alot for them... if they turned these steam machines into servers rentable for your own clan and stuff itt'd be more economical for them as well as us
a> its not safer
b> it wouldn't be less laggy it would just a server in a datacentre like any other provider
c> Steam (valve) aren't making computers or consoles, the people who make the machines are the ones that make them, valve are just advertising and offering them a 'bonus' if they supply them with their IS installed.
d> people would complain when it takes a week for someone to reset the rcon password via steam support!
ya I pointed all that out to them, they didn't seem to like my answer. Maybe if they don't like it coming from K.A.R.R. we can try from someone named K.I.T.T. next :)
False. Any private server is probably running it's own little teak and widget a so you're no more safe from a private server being run by Valve, or in someone's basement.
Again not neccessarily true. The person renting the server would have to choose the hosting bandwidth package and if they couldn't afford it elsewhere they'd likely not be able to afford it from steam. Secondly. You'd be limited to where steam has it server farms. The advantage of a private server is that it's usually catering to a bunch of people within a relatively small geographic area. A Campus, a town a city and county.... and since distance is the biggest constant determinant of ping... yeah basement hosting wins out over valve.
This just makes no sense so I'll skip it.
Point is, there's no real benefit from having Valve hosted private servers as opposed to you know any other specialized hosting servers.