Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
I know I would have if I made a Youtube show.
If it isn't something that everyone can utilize or needs, then there is no reason for it to be made for a few people. Even Gabe Newell has an account. There is a reason why no one knows what it is.
Nonono, I know what you are saying, but obviously it would be something that anyone can use. And I don't know if you have noticed, but when they play on multiplayer, you can see their names. It doesn't matter if they make another account, you will be able to find them regardless. You can even find them through names they have used before. I have a YouTube channel of my own and if I ever got to the level of "youtube fame" that the current big group of gaming YouTubers are at, I would want the option available.
Suggesting people run two entirely separate accounts (ie. pay again for all the relevant games) just so they don't have their notifications constantly filling up with spam seems completely absurd.
Not really. One for their "business" and one for their personal use. One a public account that they make videos with and where people know who they are, and another that can't be associated with them.
If someone is going to become popular in such a way (what Youtuber isn't after all) then they should be aware of the downside to that fame in advance. Just like an actor who becomes famous then starts complaining about the paparazzi always taking their picture.
They tend to have two Facebook accounts. One for themselves and one for their "business" that us usually maintained by other people. This way they can have some sort of privacy and don't have to worry about people stalking them on-line.
Even a "friends of friends" filter would get flooded. The friends would get flooded by people just to get to the main person. Then that puts the pressure on the friends, not on the Youtuber. I don't know about you, but I wouldn't want to put my friends through that.
I have never heard of an issue with too many requests preventing a log-in/loading. At the most, it would just take time for the person to clear all the invites.
I maintain that this "they should know better" stuff is victim-blaming nonsense. All suggestions can be dismissed this way, if it's so reasonable. "No, Steam shouldn't have Big Picture, people should just realise in advance that PC gaming isn't about playing on TVs with controllers". "Steam shouldn't bother with voice chat, people should just make do with text, it works fine for me".
You don't actually have anything to say about why this suggestion shouldn't be implemented, as far as I can tell, just assurances that there are rather pricey workarounds. But the nature of workarounds is that people prefer actual solutions, hence the suggestion.
I haven't heard any reason why it should be or in what way. The issue seems to be a "slowdown" of the client when logging in to Steam but I have yet to see or hear of any other instance of this.
The suggestion doesn't match the reason and is, it's self, a workaround.
As no actual suggestion or a way to lessen the issue perceived issue has even been suggested, it is more a complaint then a suggestion.
Big Picture mode is a feature that people have said they wanted and it makes sense as it is being used by many. A feature that is being suggest would only be used by a few (I've never seen anyone complain about too many friends, only about having not enough room for friends). At the cost and manpower needed to make it a feature for so few people, why would it be done, especially as it doesn't address what seems to be the main complaint of the OP.
Then again, why have those who it is supposed to be affecting not suggested it, but instead don't seem to act as it is a real issue.
Creating two account isn't a pricy workaround either. I have two accounts for myself. It was free to make and I don't make money off of the use of either account, there as they make money off their Youtube channels. They could still use on account for the game and personal use, while making a second account for the public face...at no cost. I don't see how it is pricy at all, especially if you include family sharing.
I wasn't defending the suggestion on the grounds of the "slow loading/crashing" angle. I mean I have no idea if that happens or not, but I think people should be able to cut down on notifications from randoms regardless, for the same reason email accounts have spam filters. Any additions to privacy options are good additions, as far as I'm concerned.