Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
If they are listed as offline, they have been offline. When someone blocks you, you are given exactly zero feedback about the block. As far as you can tell, everything functions as normal.
A few years back, someone asked about this in Help and Tips and so we got together and did some tests to figure out what exactly happens when someone is blocked. You can find my results posted here: https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/1/1291817208493519340/#c1291817208493735975
When someone block you, it's probably because they had a reason. It makes no sense to Steam make a list of the users that blocked you, because those users don't want you to bother them anymore.
I also don't really understand why would you want to see who blocked you anyways, I mean, you probably have some nice stalker and annoying reason. Adding users that blocked you with any alt or other account its actually harassment and annoying. I don't think it's that hard to move on and make some new friends, that you have to be everyday checking who blocked you.
I think you mean, that, you won't post any links, because there aren't such a "gaming sites" or any social media with that feature.
Instead Steam should have an IP ban for users that like to stalk and be annoying or just ban all community without being able to see profiles. That would be a needed feature to stop these kind of user attitude. imo.
This "blocked list" feature would make the "blocking an user" option, useless.
A friend of mine was kind enough to help me out, so I will give some feedback here:
If someone blocks me:
1/a. If their profile is friends-only, I will only see a private profile on my list.
1/b. If their profile is public, I will still see their profile.
2. I can't comment on their profile.
3. I can't comment on their screenshots and other content (artwork, review, etc.).
4. Trading is also disabled, I can't send a trade offer to people who blocked communication.
5. I also can't see their inventory.
6. Their friend list count (the number on the right side of their profile) decreases by one. My friend list count remains the same.
The result was that eventually none of the "long time offline" friends on my list blocked me because I'm still able to communicate with them. It seems they just don't use Steam anymore for some reason. Sometimes similar friends come back after years, but hopefully I will find a way to get in touch with them on another platform. :)
A few thoughts:
7. The "very idea" of blocking is to prevent communication with another user. Not to hide the fact that I blocked X. I think it would be fair to let them know. There was a comment in this thread from Yasahi. It wouldn't be a bad idea -> If X blocks Y, they will also stop being friends. Maybe this could work with some warnings from the Steam application: "If you really want to block Y, you will have to send a new friend request later to become friends again."
8. wuddih: Thank you if you wanted to help, I know that "Add friend" will inform me, but these people are already my friends... :) But in general, your answer is true.
9. My "statistics" are correct. I admit not using facebook so I don't know how things work there. There are other social networks (and gaming platforms too) where you have a function (or option) which shows you if a person blocked you. Sometimes you have a list, sometimes you have to navigate to a person's profile and you can see this text: "X blocked you." and a hidden profile. You might not use those sites/platforms but it doesn't mean they don't exist. Directly or indirectly, you can often have this information.
Anyway, my original idea/suggestion is about Steam, so please feel free to further discuss the function if you want. Or not.
Lady Noire a.k.a. Black Heart
You suggested a LIST, not navigating to a profile one by one to see who blocked you, very different things. Also again if those sites exist its very telling that you are adamantly refusing to name them......
That would be the best and most fair way to do it.💗
Lady Noire a.k.a. Black Heart
i think it's a little funny that someone who wants transparency about the block feature is being so coy and secretive about naming a single other forum that supports their position.
It is NOT against the rules to mention other forums on Steam. It is NOT advertising to answer a question someone asks you.
Your refusal to be transparent when asking for transparency is... again... really weird.
i guess you like your privacy (about the other forums you go to)... while... simultaneously wanting a feature that allows you to semi-breach someone else's privacy?? Strange indeed!
Again, name one site that presents you a list of people who blocked you and then ask yourself if its the best and most fair way to do it why no one does it.......
I 100% agree with this.
a, We have a blocked users list -> Users who we blocked.
b, We don't have a list of those users who blocked us. There is no symmetry (and fairness) here.
I don't agree with those comments which say it would affect anyone's privacy. From my point of view, those two lists are not different and they both contain information in connection with my profile. I have zero knowledge about IT but I have my own feeling that Valve already knows the information about case b. So they should just make that list visible to the users. I don't think it would be very complex work.
I also don't agree with those who started to talk about harassment, I don't even know why. I'm sorry, I've never got harassment from anyone. How is it that I don't have negative experience? People are generally kind and helpful with me. I've never had to use the block function.
@Hanomaly: Privacy is also important for me. I set my profile to friends-only as you can see. The purpose was not to avoid harassment but it was to stop certain people from unwanted data collection. There are websites (I won't name them, again) which cache profile information without permission. But that could be the topic of another thread. So you can see, I take privacy seriously, but if nobody harassed me in my ~20 years, it is hard to believe it..
I don't add / accept people who I think would harass me. So, in my case, the solution is so simple. And blocking is not even necessary. But this is only a personal opinion, you may have more experience and I respect it.
Lady Noire a.k.a. Black Heart
Because you're the one trying to invade it. lul
False, someone blocking you doesn't effect you at all, it effects what THEY see.
Of course it wouldn't be hard to do, but it would make no sense and defeat the entire purpose, and as repeatedly mentioned no site in the world does this for that reason.
It would be used to harrass people, you can see who has you blocked and then harrass them with an alternate account.
Again its a crappy idea, and as its been repeatedly pointed out you cannot name a single website in the WORLD that allows you to see a list of people who blocked you. There is a reason for that......