Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
The advertising point is also that you can install whatever you like on it, including Windows. You knew the specifications/important parts before making the purchase, and were free to look at reviews, videos etc that existed before the purchase. Since you've bought many switches, you know not to expect a discount just for owning a previous model or family of products.
As said before, you can sell your deck and buy the new Deck. Don't buy something if it doesn't have parts you'd like, or if it has parts you don't want. To the company, that means you bought exactly what you were happy buying, and that is a reason not to give people discounts.
The company I worked for did not give people discounts on a next model, for owning one or more previous products, no matter how many products they owned. If they wanted it, they had to buy it at full price like everyone else, or wait for a future sale, kind of like what's going on with the original Deck. Also given the initial model is declared as "painful" to sell at the price, selling a new model likely within the same statement of the base model makes no sense to discount unless you're phasing out the product & clearing inventory space.
Given all the statements & experience, giving out discounts simply for owning the previous model makes zero sense from a business perspective unless again, phasing out/clearing inventory space.
So it's either should've waited for the OLED Deck, or sell the original deck and buy the new one at less loss to the wallet. Don't buy products with specs/specific parts you're not happy with. Research before you buy.
just make the most out of what you have, no matter what happens in life new upgrades will always make you feel that way, but you need to find enjoyment with what you have bought and don't let anything stop you from making the most of what you have.
find satisfaction in it
You shouldnt. You thought it was worth it at the time.
Yeah, it is.
Every adult understands that a person on your Steam Friends List doesn't necessarily need to be your friend. Only a handful of people in my Friend List are my friends and, as I said, they don't post here.
And why do you feel the need go to through my Friend List to make your argument? Sounds a bit obsessive.
You can install Windows on it if you want but fact still remains that the thing was released with a terrible screen, terrible battery life, it's native software was notoriously undercooked and it had a cavalcade of other glaring issues.
Additionally, You also shouldn't have to install a different OS just to have a slightly better experience. If that's the case, then Windows, not SteamOS, should have come pre-installed.
An option meant for a niche subsegment of the userbase shouldn't become a requirement for all. If it is, then it's a testament of how much of a failure the Native software was. Which is why this whole windows talk is utterly irrelevant. The Deck should be judged on it's hardware and native software.
as a pc gamer on steam i know fairly well how to use windows, spending countless hours in linux sites to try and configure my steam deck would not be a bonus for me.
also... if steam proto is working with a linux build couldn't you guys develop some type of android based proto ?
Luckily for you it's preinstalled and preconfigured in the deck.
You are not the only one. I've seen many gamers on X(Twitter) saying the same thing.
The weirdest thing was seeing the Valve guys on IGN saying the new version is the version they always wanted to make... So why didn't they? OLED screens were already available, affordable and just as efficient in 2022. This makes zero sense.
When you can't understand why someone is doing something, you look at the results and tou inferr the motive, and the results seem to suggest that Valve wanted to craft a situation where they could easily double dip, sell the unfinished product, beta test it on it's users and then release the product they should have released in the first place.
Not really weird at all, you just don't know how manufacturing works. As you make more units the price for the component falls off and it becomes cheaper to make. The first deck at the time was already aggressively priced and was untested. With its success, and the millions of units made it approached a point where they could then create another iteration and even lower the price of the first one.
All new tech drops rapidly in price after the first year or two, its why bluray players were so expensive at first and then rapidly started dropping in price.
Success? You think the Steam Deck numbers are impressive for a dedicated gaming device from one of the biggest names in the gaming industry? The Wii U sold 7 times more and was considered a flop.
The OG Steam Deck wasn't a success because word of mouth was "It's not ready" so the amount of potential buyers was very limited: Tech heads, Valve fanboys and people like me who like to make their own minds by testing the thing themselves.
The real launch of the Steam Deck is going to be now, now that it's a presentable device with improved software that we collectively payed to beta test. The success that the Steam Deck will start enjoying now is owed to us.
You are simply making an assumption that OLED and other components used in the new Deck where cheaper in 2022 than they are in 2023. An assumption that willfully ignores the record levels of inflation we are currently witnessing. That inflation also impacts the supply lines that provide all the materials needed to manufacture OLED screens.
Isn't that exactly the point?
If they knew a better model was coming out in a few months, they might not have bought it. Because it was not worth it even then, it was just the one option available that you had to settle for.
Yeah ... except the information "there will be a better model soon". Which is quite a bit of an omission in order to make an informed decission.
And given Valve's track record the chance for there being a better model or they canning the whole thing was 50:50.
Besides, it makes no difference whether a new model was announced or not. That doesn't change that you got exactly what you paid for, and you are owed nothing more.