安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
I view them as interactive picture books in most cases. Either way my point about either being able to not see them on the page or move them altogether is valid, regardless.
There are products in the store that one doesn't like to see. Whoop-dee doo.
This has been the case since stores were invented.
They're all tagged anyway, so Steam should just officially enable negative filtering on the store search so it's easier to get to.
Of course, the tagging isn't always accurate, like you get Barbie games tagged "horror" just because a sufficient number of bored teenagers think that it's funny to do so. Oh well.
Meanwhile, if anything, the occasional presence of visual novels will serve as a handy reminder that people with different tastes exist.
Now, if we're talking about how they keep showing up in the Discovery Queue, then that's because you've run out of more popular games for Steam to suggest to you.
There is a very small subset of VNs which reduce the interactivity to "click to continue". Often they feature decission making, failure states and different endings, which is enough to make them games for most people.
As I said: TellTales latest games don't differ much, yet very few argue that they are not games.
You can make similar distinctions with Interactive Movies or Rail Shooters. Separating one kind of games with low level interactivity but having others still features is bigottery.
You seriously called me a bigot for disagreeing that visual novels are games? Thats unnecessary. I never once made fun of or criticized peoples interest in them, I just stated I don't think theyre necessarily games and I personally don't enjoy them or want to see them. Frankly i'm insulted that you would call someone a bigot for that.
In most cases, the only difference between a physical book like a visual novel and one on steam is that it's displayed on a screen and you use a mouse to click, to me. I don't think that you can call them games, because it's not considered a game when the product is in physical form. This is for standard visual novels.
It would be like Valve releasing books on steam, but calling them 'games' if they have pictures in it and run inside an application.
I haven't. I say it would be if you actually do so.
But I would call you a biggot if you insist that VNs are not games while insisting that other stuff with around the same level of interactivity are. That's why said earlier, unless you ready to go in-depth what defines a game, there is little point in this discussion.
And that is where you are dead wrong. There are VNs that are like that. But many feature decision making, RPG elements or even fighting or some kind. Heck, most JRPGs are little more than cutscenes between some fights.
and by extension, the people who would want that are 'bigots' don't know how you can think you werent calling me that, but ok.
In that case those games aren't visual novels, they are games with visual novel elements. A pure visual novel, even with interactivity/choices, is no different from a physical book other than it runs inside an application.
If yiou can win or lose it's a game. If you can't win or lose it's not a game. a visual novel isn't a game unless you can lose. Streetfighter is definately a game.
so that would make a choose-your-adventure novel a game? I don't necessarily agree there
You don't have to 'agree' for it to be true. By your logic Zork isnt a 'game'
there is no truth, only perception. If you have a better argument, present it.
It's like those people who argue over whether RWBY is anime.
that wasnt really the point of my post, but i should have the ability to limit what i dont want to see.