Інсталювати Steam
увійти
|
мова
简体中文 (спрощена китайська)
繁體中文 (традиційна китайська)
日本語 (японська)
한국어 (корейська)
ไทย (тайська)
Български (болгарська)
Čeština (чеська)
Dansk (данська)
Deutsch (німецька)
English (англійська)
Español - España (іспанська — Іспанія)
Español - Latinoamérica (іспанська — Латинська Америка)
Ελληνικά (грецька)
Français (французька)
Italiano (італійська)
Bahasa Indonesia (індонезійська)
Magyar (угорська)
Nederlands (нідерландська)
Norsk (норвезька)
Polski (польська)
Português (португальська — Португалія)
Português - Brasil (португальська — Бразилія)
Română (румунська)
Русский (російська)
Suomi (фінська)
Svenska (шведська)
Türkçe (турецька)
Tiếng Việt (в’єтнамська)
Повідомити про проблему з перекладом
We can't have nice things on here because people abuse it thats why.
There is already a market for it, its called buying the DLC music and listening to it on your own. If people want to listen to music while to go to someones profile then start up your music player and listen to music while you are on someones profile.
No Valve does not have the rights to broadcast the music already. They don't own all the games on Steam, they only sell them. Not even all the developers/IP owners of the games own the rights to broadcast the music like you want because they license the music for use in their game.
Yes Valve would have to pay something to integrate Spotify into steam profiles, because thats what Spotify would want, is money for them doing that.
Even if they didn't, people would then start demanding every other music streaming service to be embedded into the steam profile and there are lots of them. "But they can say no to them" they can but if you allow spotify you will need to allow everything else because there will be an unending spam of people wanting their one.
If you want people to listen to what ever music you pick, put a link to your spotify stuff in the top part of your profile.
This like saying, if you want see the steam background, just put a link into your description. It should be a automatic feature and not a burden
People that dont have 'liked' suggestions always go to this nonsense. We're not the one trying to 'sell' the idea, if you have an idea trying to 'sell' it is on you only. We're not here to tell people how to get something improved or implemented, and we're more than aware of the low-to-zero chance something has of being implemented and why.
As per usual, people also go to "you must be steam" or "you must be paid". No. Your idea is just awful and people realize it. Instead of trying to go 'on the attack', perhaps think things over rather than think wrapping something awful in gold foil makes the whole thing golden.
It like the Steam Pointshop, nobody knowed they wanted it, until they had it and cant live without it anymore.
Thanks for the conversation and bumping this post with entry's up!
Cosmetics that go with profiles, chat and emotes for chat/forums isn't music.
People also can't know they want something if it doesn't exist and suddenly does, of which they can at the moment of it existing choose if they like it or not, but I doubt they "cant live without it anymore", only people addicted to emotes/backgrounds etc will want to keep using it
It's not much of a conversation when you have to warp words, use bad comparisons and use dishonesty to attempt to push the idea.
And thus the suggestion ...
Why do people alway feel like pointing out the status quo and behaving like it's immutable?
Currently Steam forces me load and see a profile picture which I might not like to see. Personally I can do very well without it.
The suggestion is to implement a sound player. Don't get hang up on Spotify specifically. All it takes it Steam implementing a player showcase and content creators to make music available for it. For example through the points shop.
There are no legal issues or technical issues involved.
Now, do I personally want this? No. Do I mind as long as it isnt autoplay and especially doesn't blast me full volume? No.
There is already lots of other stuff that I can do perfectly fine on a profile page. Like ... the profile page in general.
Considering the very first reply already mentioned that it was "asked many times before" that statement is quite obviously untrue.
And the people arguing against it, are a tiny amount of users even using these forums some of which are pretty much against every change, no matter what it is.
The simple truth is: some people will like it and use it, some people will hate it. Most people will be utterly indifferent as long as it is implemented sensibly. And even more won't even notice because they barely visit profile pages anyway.
I can get behind this, thats steam should just be for "games" and chat. But companys expands, and is there still really a place for users who can customize their profile? Many users use steam to get in each game to 100%, for just showing their achievments. So whats wrong about a idea.
Sure it seems impossible, but i just see a money factor, and third parties like spotify may pay this price to expand their reach on steam.
I like the evoloving of the steam client so far and their game devolpers, it like windows and all hardware devolper provide their drivers for it for free. (In the very beginning, now its normal thinking)
I also could start new theard for mor colors and better ways use of background on bigger screens.
So i am turning this off now since to many trolls.
Again, we do not have to improve someone elses idea, market/sell the idea that someone else came up with. If we were to suggest a much better way to make it valuable, we would most likely make our own suggestion thread.
Being able to toggle something / default:OFF, is not a good reason to implement something, just like this is a poor excuse to do the suggestion:
Because companies don't have to expand into things they don't want to do, or because a user wants something they do not do.
"Everyone that disagrees with me is a troll or is paid" is not exactly a strong stance for a suggestion.
Steam is niche. Video gaming might be on it's way to mainstream, but mostly by thanks to consoles and - more importantly - mobile.
Spotify has a user base of 400+ million with 180 million subscribers in 2021 according to them.
Steam has a user base of 120 million monthly active users. (Which includes bots and secondary accounts, I assume.)
And with Steam being an online-centric platform, the overlap is most likely already quite enormous.
Seriously, Steam's user base is quite laughable outside of gaming.
Steam is already implenting features which are "fun" to compete with other clients from other companys.
It's nice that this feature was already reqguestet, but that does not mean it should stay with just single post. Multiple post acquires attention.
(And putting one-two devolper, for just ammount of players is still profitable)