Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I'm just woundering, why one woud like to play games on machines not even capable of running steam. I mean, aren't the games usually more demanding than the client?
I used to have real trouble with it when I was running it on a ~13 year old laptop. However I have since moved to a much better computer and had some really persistent issues with steam being unnecessarily slow. This led me to think that since steam works in a similar way to electron which too is bad for performance, it would make sense to replace it with something like GTK or QT which is much faster.
The other thing too is that the CLI version for steam doesn't have chat which is usable, but annoying, and seems* to only work with DRM free games.
*Please correct me if I'm wrong
The availability of the source code has no impact on the security. Take Keepass* for example.
This rule doesn't apply with badly made software however, but steam is relatively** good at making software, so I would assume that it is fine.
*https://keepass.info/
**See steam mobile
"System security should not depend on the secrecy of the implementation or its components."
If the security relies on people not knowing something, that's pretty bad.