安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Dota 2, Artifact, The HL Franchaise, The l4d Franchaise, the Portal Franchaise,, and the CS:GO franchaise. That's it.
Comic Book publishers don't supply paper. They merely provide printing services. WHich the comic creator has to pay for.
It seems you don't quite understand the difference between a Developer, a Publisher, and a Retailer.
Yes But in this regard Steam is a retailer/Distributor. And what they are charging is a 30% commission. Which is actually less of a cut than most Brick and Mortar retailers take.
Yes, a theory based on the idea that a person has even a shred of willpower.
Most people do that actually.
No. Because of that 1 million there will be people who decide they want to buy it. The point is the decision to buy or not is made by everyone. Some decide to, ome decide not to. You can decide not to just as easily as you decide to. I mean I see many interesting early Access games and I don't buy them. Why? Because I don't like the idea of buying something as yet unfinished. Simple. Some people decide because the game doesn't look like something they want, some because the price isn't what they want.
You can decline to purchase tthe game until the game meets your standards.
No they are just above the age of 5. Which is when most humans start learning self-control and self-modderation.
You do realize that in most games the majority of lloot boxes and such are purchased by less than 50% of the playerbase right? You're basically doing 'The devil made me do it' as an excuse.
Yes they can. and many do.
Yes because self-control is such a clidish....you know I take that back. such a mentality totally explains the crushinglevels of credit card debt in siome countries. People having no willpower of concept of self-control....also explains the obesity epidemic come to think of it
Well you're not actuually dispelling that notion.
To me a publisher is someone who prepares books, music, media or games to sell. It's just that simple. Who cares about their agreement with the content maker. Maybe they can pay the content maker money to publish and profit, maybe content maker pays them to publish, Maybe they can decide on the price base on the game's popularity and data analytics. Maybe content maker can decide on the price. it's all up to themselves. Things can change. The publisher's job scope is to deliver and publish content.
I'll agree to disagree and stop discussing about those small stuff.
Publishers set the editorial and commercial direction for companies that publish books, newspapers, magazines and digital content. They make decisions about the markets their companies will serve and the type of content they will offer their audience.
Steam is a store.
The store should not sell broken things early, they are not a fully functioning product. It can reduce the credibility of the store to sell broken things.
Actually all the EA games are playable, that is one of the requirement of EA games. The game might be buggy and incomplete but its playable.
Again though, if you don't like EA games then just uncheck the box on your preferences to see them. No one HAS to buy them and you can filter them all out of the store if you don't want them.
Nope. They are a distributor and service provider. There are very few games that Valve published.
A publisher has a different meaning in function. Mainly that they purchase the publishing rights for a game. Valve only has the distribution rights. One of the main differences is indeed being able to set a price. Others are being able to localise or to demand changes. Both of which Valve also can't do.
Those who want, can buy, Those who don't see it as worth their mony won't. Everyone is warned in the most explicit way possiible prior to purchase. if you don't like it. DOn't buuy it but for the most part I've only seen the positives. It has allowed many stekllar games to pop out and given people the ability enjoy these games while they are in development if they so choose. It's an option for the consumer. That's all.
Then your understanding of what a publlisher is is flawed. A publisher is someone who pays for the right to control the distribution of something. That's it. They can be considered akin to high level investors.
Someone who actually desires a greater/accurate understanding of things. You're defining a word in a way you want but it is not the correct definition ergo any assertion you make based upon that flawed understanding is aurtomaticallly incorrect.
their job is to publish. Delivery is not automatically part of that. And by publish it basically just means they invest and collect from the game's revenue. That's all. Anything else is a s you say, subject to change and negotiation.
This is basically not about agreement or disagreement. this is just about you being objectively incorrect.
You guys see publisher as the company that makes the game and I agree with it.
I mean really as its been said a publisher serves two main roles.
1. To provide financing in exchange for profits
2. To distribute and handle the deals with stores to sell the games
The publisher isn't the one who makes the game at all, but they might have project managers working with the developers to keep an eye on things and to help the developers as needed.
Number 2 isn't always a given. Sure if they consider you to be top talent they'll gladly provide marketing and distribution...for a fee.