Give X-amount rewards instead of single-click.
Title kinda already explains my suggestion.
When i want to gift someone an award i need to one-click-every-single-time.
Let us have the option to fill in an X amount of rewards.

Example:
- You have 900 Steam points.
- You want to give 3 awards which costs 300 points to a friend.
- You have to click 3 times.

Suggestion:
- You have 900 Steam points.
- Give reward > Amount: 3x > done.
< >
Visar 1-3 av 3 kommentarer
Hello,

Don't you think that the focus should not be to give a lot of awards quickly to the same person (award spam) but to give awards (from time to time) to different people who deserve it throughout the years / months?

Your approach would encourage people to give a massive amount of awards to certain users, which would make the 'award system' less fair (it already is, and I know about people who _pay_ for awards, which is even worse).

If I just think about how I gave awards in the past: I tried to give awards (profile, review, screenshot awards, etc.) to those friends on my list who hadn't even got any award yet. But I never focused on giving more awards to the same person just because "oh every review he wrote deserves an award". You can imagine a lot of similar situations.

If I misunderstood your idea/suggestion, let me know.

:catjump:
Senast ändrad av SleepyKitti ❤; 25 mar, 2021 @ 15:04
[THG] WHOLF⚡ 25 mar, 2021 @ 15:41 
Don't you think that the focus should not be to give a lot of awards quickly to the same person (award spam) but to give awards (from time to time) to different people who deserve it throughout the years / months?
Yes and no, as for me example have enough rewards that i don't need.
I simply don't want to click each and every single time for minutes upon minutes just to give 1 award. In my opinion, this also prevents spamming awards.
Your approach would encourage people to give a massive amount of awards to certain users, which would make the 'award system' less fair (it already is, and I know about people who _pay_ for awards, which is even worse).
Highly agreed and understanable yes.

It's just, i don't want to do so much effort just for 1 single award each time.
If i want to award something to someone, like giving 20 awards.
I need to click 20 times to do this you know..
Mailer 25 mar, 2021 @ 16:28 
What I came to think about is if they made a system where users can deposit their points in divisible quantities, pick the corresponding quantities of each type of award that they want to send out along with those points, mesh those two prompts together in a smart foolproof way, and then have those awards be randomly distributed to users of the community, assuming that you only don't want to have to go through the trouble of repeatedly gifting points to a single user.

Of course, some people might not appreciate awards from random people, and maybe the actual purpose of such awards being distributed is that you are supposed to explore community content and go on a frenzy every now and again. There were already some people that didn't entirely appreciate awards on their profiles but i imagine that those are what would be randomly distributed, if anything, to keep awards somewhat genuine.

Maybe I am interpreting this wrong and it's just that you actually want to flush vast sums of points, forfeiting 2/3s of the pool along the way, to a specific user, in which case your only bet would be to send the most expensive ones for minimal effort. For example, I can't entirely anticipate why they wouldn't allow you to repeatedly award users based on their profile alone, unlike community content, where there obviously has to be a limit per user.
Senast ändrad av Mailer; 25 mar, 2021 @ 16:33
< >
Visar 1-3 av 3 kommentarer
Per sida: 1530 50

Datum skrivet: 25 mar, 2021 @ 9:20
Inlägg: 3