Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
Don't you think that the focus should not be to give a lot of awards quickly to the same person (award spam) but to give awards (from time to time) to different people who deserve it throughout the years / months?
Your approach would encourage people to give a massive amount of awards to certain users, which would make the 'award system' less fair (it already is, and I know about people who _pay_ for awards, which is even worse).
If I just think about how I gave awards in the past: I tried to give awards (profile, review, screenshot awards, etc.) to those friends on my list who hadn't even got any award yet. But I never focused on giving more awards to the same person just because "oh every review he wrote deserves an award". You can imagine a lot of similar situations.
If I misunderstood your idea/suggestion, let me know.
I simply don't want to click each and every single time for minutes upon minutes just to give 1 award. In my opinion, this also prevents spamming awards.
Highly agreed and understanable yes.
It's just, i don't want to do so much effort just for 1 single award each time.
If i want to award something to someone, like giving 20 awards.
I need to click 20 times to do this you know..
Of course, some people might not appreciate awards from random people, and maybe the actual purpose of such awards being distributed is that you are supposed to explore community content and go on a frenzy every now and again. There were already some people that didn't entirely appreciate awards on their profiles but i imagine that those are what would be randomly distributed, if anything, to keep awards somewhat genuine.
Maybe I am interpreting this wrong and it's just that you actually want to flush vast sums of points, forfeiting 2/3s of the pool along the way, to a specific user, in which case your only bet would be to send the most expensive ones for minimal effort. For example, I can't entirely anticipate why they wouldn't allow you to repeatedly award users based on their profile alone, unlike community content, where there obviously has to be a limit per user.