Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Shows how little the guys that are most in favour of DRMs know about what they do, how they work or what their imapct is.
The 2 biggest impacts DRMs have on games are quite obvious but strange that some people have to deny reality that hard:
- big increase in load-times - most forms of DRM (specially things like Denuvo) have a large impact on load-times, often being as extreme as going from 15 seconds without to well over a minute with DRM.
- reliability - most forms of DRM nowadays rely on online validation which leads to problems like the game not launching when the server is overloaded or down (assassins creed was a good example) and also means that after some time it might very well become impossible to play the games you have bought.
But sure - go ahead, please explain to us how it is oh so great that games toake way longer to load, can suddenly stop working all together and on lower end system often have worse performance - really a thing that everybody wants.
Funny enough, you won't be able to provide any proof of that as its a common claim, but is never actually backed up. The only time its true was with I believe one of the Sonic games, and that was the case I mentioned where the dev's screwed up and did it wrong.
If you knew how DRM works, you'd understand that most of them operate one time when launching the game, and after the initial check they don't do anything. So the claim that they degrade the game is nonsensical.
There have been back to back tests of the cracked games and games with DRM and in almost every case they perform near identical.
That was something which I specifically mentioned, but as I pointed out the modern forms of DRM are also very easy to remove now compared to what they used to be.
Your also ignoring the fact that STEAM is DRM, and for instance has no issue on performance. You are looking at a miniscule outlier where the dev's screwed up the implementation of the DRM and trying to use that to say DRM is bad when 99.9% of DRM is impossible to notice.
https://youtu.be/Jt_B1kat1nQ
Dosent seem identical to me
it is easy to notice escpecially in the load times
This video is just for informational
And out of internet forums and youtube videos people don't really care about it.
That's a common urban myth that has been debunked numerous times. What occurs in nearly every case is one of the following
1. They are testing different versions of the game with different patches, so performance varies
2. They are testing the game officially before and after Denuvo is removed but those patches often contain other performance improvements.
It's basically IMPOSSIBLE to compare identical versions of a game with and without Denuvo, but the rare cases where it is possible have shown no difference - https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2019/09/ars-analysis-denuvo-drm-doesnt-slow-down-batman-arkham-knight/
https://www.pcgamer.com/denuvo-drm-performance-final-fantasy-15/
Those are 2 of the rare examples where you can compare the exact same version with and without Denuvo and there is no difference. Testing different versions of a software and then trying to claim that Denuvo is the reason for the difference is not backed up by any evidence.
Just because its on youtube you can't assume its the truth,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5kJ9NfYwlcI
My favourite is Conan Exiles. Testing graphical performance with hair and without hair. Which quite obviously does have a heavy impact.
Also Heavy Rain were there is one obvious outlier in the frames measuring and else it's pretty much the same with differences around 1 %. Which is normal fluctuation.
But that doesn't fit the narrative.
There HAVE been games where it does effect the performance, not denying that, but the impact is usually tied to how the dev's implement it
Just because you can find one game that didnt have any performance issues doesnt mean its the same across the board...devs could have done something special to bypass the stress added...Even IF** (big IF) every game (keyword: every) showed no performance
degrade using Denuevo...theres still the facts that a)you have to have
an online connection just to play single player games, b)it does add
extra stress to your hardware (rootkits do not run on magic) and c)it
locks your hardware specs to game installation (which means if you ever
change out your pc hardware you might have issues playing that game).
Oh and theres d)games that have Denuevo are STILL being cracked and
pirated (see Shadow of War). Denuevo is nothing but intrusive rootkit
DRM that punishes paying customers in all those ways above and doesnt
stop most pirates...it has to go.
\This comment is the most saddest thing ive seen, truly makes me think your not human at all.
Just because you found 2 articles on a random site you cant assume and dosent mean i'ts automatically true either