Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Still money out of thin air. How else do you expect a company to provide a 100% risk for credit without any sort of profit. They need money to support the company but they also need it to cover costs when someone doesn't uphold their contract to pay what they owe.
https://zip.co/uk/finance/help/
What does it cost to run Zip on my website and/or instore?
We charge a Business Fee, which is a small percentage of each successful transaction, very similar to your card processing fees. Our Business Manager can discuss specific fee structures with each individual Business. Zip scales with you, the more transaction volume you process the better the deal.
Only way I see Valve even considering this would be by adding a fee to cover their lose for each transaction. Pretty sure most wouldn't be happy with having to pay an extra x if they choose that method.
Personally I'm not a fan of payment methods which pay after the fact, but it's not my business.
Do you have actual figures to back this up? Or is it the general "I think, it's probably" to attempt to make the proposal more interesting?
I have actual figures but cannot share them, sorry. Several companies I know have increased sales for 2 reasons. Making it easier for the consumer to buy and also attracting people from competitive sites who don't have ZipPay options. Like you said, they may not respond but, now they have the idea and will see if it is a valid option and then add it. Their marketing people wouldn't be very good if they didn't listen to there customers. I just spent $230 on Supercheap for a 4wd battery that I can now pay off over 4 months. I will have the money in a couple of days so I will just pay them outright with no cost to me. It got me out of trouble. There are plenty of $80 and over games that I may buy if ZipPay was the option as I budget myself to $25 a month for games.
It won't be for everyone but it does give people choice and opens up a potential increase of sales scenario for Valve.
Well those figuires would be useless as they are in totally different markets....
If you can budget $25 a month you can easily put that money aside and buy the game every 3 months if needed without such a service.
We know generally when each big sale is. Till then you save up enough money you buy the games you want, you can play all the other games you have.
Thank you. I see it has already been discussed with some good arguments put forward by yourself.
You are quite right, every business is unique and so are people. Because you seem to be against it for your own reasons it does not mean others are. As an example, sometimes all your friends are getting a game to play against each other and you can't afford it for a while, this allows you to still get the game so you can still be part of your friend group. Like I said, we will all have different reasons for and against but, this post is more about those people that can see a benefit in it rather than against it.
Some people are just hopeless at saving so these types of things that don't cost you any interest is ideal for them.
EDIT: And those people that have terrible money management skills need to improve them not facilitate ways to charge interest because they lack basic money management. Better to learn with games than other more important things like Rent or food for example.