Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
It would also be used by people to harass others or troll them. Make a popular mod, you now have the ability to threaten to block someone's access to said mod, for little to no reason.
And them downloading the mod does not effect you.
Blocking their ability to download mods would effect them beyond what is reasonable and beyond the point of harassment (eg: direct communication). It also could have an effect on servers as well as it may limit those who regularly play on them, if they can't get the mod as well as the server if you block the user who runs the server (depending on server structure). So the block would have consequences beyond just the user blocked.
If you don't want others to use the mod, make it private.
And I am not blocking people either. Ha, ha. You think I would take away your freedom of speech? ROFL.
Who do you think you're dealing with here? LOL.
Blocking people... what do you take me for? The worst I would do is ignore you. Or block you for a little moment. But nothing as extreme as exclude you for all eternity.
I do report comments when I don't like them. But that's about it.
I do not like your idea. Anyway, that's just my opinion. It would give you too much power. You can always speak. That's no problem. Just not too loud. Ha, ha.
Your idea is like saying: Everyone is welcome, except you. That's just a terrible thing to do to someone. And it would cause trouble. Because, what if the someone you blocked has a friend, who is suddenly not welcome anymore either?
Nah. Bad idea. Everyone would simply get disconnected at some point. And that would be sad.
And the consequence is that they get blocked from communicating with your.
I see no reason why the ability to use the mod should be included, only it that doing so could cause larger issues.
you're not going to give that person a cinnamon roll anymore let alone acknowledge them.
You can still choose to ignore them.
Except you aren't doing that. You gave the rolls to someone else to distribute for free, then someone disagreed with you two blocks away and now you want to exclude the person from something you already agreed can be freely distributed.
For games with server, you would also be (potentially) removing the server's ability to function. This may also cause a backlash against the modder as well, leading to more blocks and more issues.
You have the ability to make the mod private or friends only if you want some control over who can use it or not. The ability to block someone is not likely since, as I said earlier, it could cause larger issues.
no, you dont give the rolls to people so it may be given back under another persons name when youre the one who made those rolls thats against rules.
in the end with or without backlash (even server functionality), its all up to the modder to block certain people/groups or not and control who should be using it freely since the modder is giving it to people for free.
just like twitter, instagram, facebook when you block someone on there they wont just be able to communicate with you, they wont see your pictures, videos, stories, profile, group posts etc so just because a mod is more entertaining and enjoyable it becomes less controllable for the creator to ensure user satisfaction across all variety of people?! HELL NO, it must come with a greater responsibility from the users.