Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (chino tradicional)
日本語 (japonés)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandés)
Български (búlgaro)
Čeština (checo)
Dansk (danés)
Deutsch (alemán)
English (inglés)
Español de Hispanoamérica
Ελληνικά (griego)
Français (francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (húngaro)
Nederlands (holandés)
Norsk (noruego)
Polski (polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português-Brasil (portugués de Brasil)
Română (rumano)
Русский (ruso)
Suomi (finés)
Svenska (sueco)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraniano)
Comunicar un error de traducción
That being said, I don't agree on using a pie-chart since pie-charts are pretty much always inferior when displaying proportions in comparison to say... solid blocks stacked up against each other, and it's also a lot more rendering than there has to be.
Secondly think about how that looks for games of a gigabyte or less.
They show in megabytes becaus ethat is the last truely signifanct measure in these things. We stopped thinking in kilobytes by the kearly 90's.. And as said imagine what that pie chart looks like when showing the space useage for 2 gb on a 500gb Drive.
I mean if its a small game than it should show in megabytes, but once it hits a gigabyte I'd like to have the option to show big is it in gigabytes as well. Like this: this game is 7,000 mb or 7 gb. That way I know exactly how big it is.
I mean my file system shows something as mb until it hits the magic thousand, and then it shows it in gigs. I'd just like the size to be shown on steam as a convenience.
Except the latter readed is actually less exact.
That's because from the OS stand point storage gets a little more complicated due to file system overhead.
I'm not against the idea of toggling the display between Megabytes and gigabytes but really.. what's the difference between
7313 Mbytes
7.313 Gbytes
Sure I can tell if a game fits on my drive free space, but it's not that easy to guess how much of that free space is going to take.
I'd choose a bar instead of a pie chart though. Pie charts take too much space on a window, a bar graph though would display the same info in a much smaller (and more window-friendly) format.
for example, a random game i picked to install just gave me this info:
required: 1033 MB
available: 16098 MB
can i look at that and guess there is plenty of space? SURE. but it isn't exactly obvious what the ratio is between the two.
i also really, really do not understand anyone who's response is "DERR, BUT IT'S JUST A BIGGER NUMBER DAEUURR. IS EASY." sure. but it could be easier, more useful, and present information in a clearer way. that's why i made the feature request.
to anyone continuing to poop on it, have fun with your graphing calculators.
yeah. whatever works. i think there is a bunch of wasted space in that diagogue box as-is, so i figured a pie chart would probably fit and present the information more clearly.
This has been brought up years ago. It's stunning that it's still an issue.
7313 MB is 7.141 GB
7313 GB is 7488 MB
That's the difference.
Technically, no.
7313 MB = 7.313 GB
7313 MiB = 7.141 GiB
Oh right the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ "comsumer" standart.
Because they can only use base 10 conversion, instead of the proper base 2 that computer work with.
them laying it out as a table rather than text string would be much better. that way they can alighn the colums to the right. and make it easier at a glance.