Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
The only benefit adding a non-steam game has is that it lets other know what you are playing. Anything beyond that could case too many issues. Even just the non-steam game has caused problems with scammer setting it up to say "In non-steam game Admin Tools".
That's basically all non-steam games are. Sshort cut links. and NO OP steam's not likely to give database and cpu cycles to games games they did not make money on.
Why would valve care if you put 30 hours into Notepad and called it Starcraft? Valve shouldn't care if the game is valid or not. All it would be doing is tracking how long you've used it and the name you gave it.
Would likely be simple to implement, just another database heading.
Actually, the more features Steam adds, the more likely people are to use Steam for all of their gaming needs. In addition, not every game that Steam sells is sold exclusively by Steam. I have many games, now available on Steam, that I purchased as Indie projects before they got to Steam. They're listed in my Steam library as non-steam games, and as such don't appear in my profile.
So when someone sees my profile they don't see that I've put over 500 hours into that game. Because of that they don't get curious and search the Steam store for the game. Also because of that they certainly don't buy the game from Steam... See, it all goes around in a circle of marketing.
Then you would be allowing false information and that would defeat the purpose of such a feature. It would also be highly abused.
I don't see the benefits from it being out weighed by the issues it would cause.
I don't want people having a game called "Spawn of Totoro's Mom" on their profile.
Because that's more offensive than "Genital Jousting", "Hentai", "Sex and Broadcasting", or "Slave Story"??
(all of which ARE games on Steam)
Please tell me how the current system is accurate in ANY way? All I have to do is start up a game and leave it minimized overnight... Bam! 8 hours of game play, and in reality I haven't even tried it.
But not names of Steam users, correct? Because if it were, that would be just trolling.
Those are game actualy played and with tracked stats vs another way to insult and harrass others.
Still, you state no benefits of such a system in any post.
Valve benefits from games sold on Steam being on your profile for others to see. They don't benefit if you are advertising games not sold on Steam there.
But you played the game. That is more accurate then Half Life 3 being show on you profile for 8 hours.
And achivements would also show how little of the game was played.
Wrong... http://steamcommunity.com/id/Hentai
I don't see that user playing a game with another user's name in the title.
That is a custom URL, not the name of the user.
Still leads back to a user... But anyway, I just did that because I could.
I think the key factor here is that Steam, like any gaming launcher, wants to be the SOLE LAUNCHER that players use. The more players use the Steam launcher, the more exposure those players have to advertising. Doesn't matter if the player is playing a non-Steam game or not. They're being exposed to the Steam system, and as such, it's advertising.
The more features added to make players WANT to use Steam for all their Non-Steam games, the more of a benefit that Non-Steam feature becomes.
Except the user has to be on Steam already in order to see it, so it isn't benefiting Steam/Valve.
A feature that can be exploited, yet offers little to no benefit.
Another down side is it would bog down support with reports due to inappropriate used.