安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
In reference to the GTA V bundles, it's probably intentional to sell the one with the Shark Cards cheaper than the bundle without them. Since Shark Cards are consumable in-game items, it's in Rockstar's best interests to entice you to use them so you can eventually buy more of them in the future. You get a taste for what they are, how they're used, and will want some more.
Yes, I'm not a publisher, or a retailer, or anything along those lines, but unless I have some stock that I want to get rid of (which isn't the case here), if I prefer my customers to buy something and not buy something else, then I'd just not offer them the something else.
From what I read here, we have the weird situation that the objectively inferior product is sold for more. And they are not even distinct products, where some customer might still prefer the "something else": its the exact same product, just with or without an extra included. Which isn't even welded to it; you could also choose to just ignore the extra.