Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
In reference to the GTA V bundles, it's probably intentional to sell the one with the Shark Cards cheaper than the bundle without them. Since Shark Cards are consumable in-game items, it's in Rockstar's best interests to entice you to use them so you can eventually buy more of them in the future. You get a taste for what they are, how they're used, and will want some more.
Yes, I'm not a publisher, or a retailer, or anything along those lines, but unless I have some stock that I want to get rid of (which isn't the case here), if I prefer my customers to buy something and not buy something else, then I'd just not offer them the something else.
From what I read here, we have the weird situation that the objectively inferior product is sold for more. And they are not even distinct products, where some customer might still prefer the "something else": its the exact same product, just with or without an extra included. Which isn't even welded to it; you could also choose to just ignore the extra.