Installera Steam
logga in
|
språk
简体中文 (förenklad kinesiska)
繁體中文 (traditionell kinesiska)
日本語 (japanska)
한국어 (koreanska)
ไทย (thailändska)
Български (bulgariska)
Čeština (tjeckiska)
Dansk (danska)
Deutsch (tyska)
English (engelska)
Español - España (Spanska - Spanien)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanska - Latinamerika)
Ελληνικά (grekiska)
Français (franska)
Italiano (italienska)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesiska)
Magyar (ungerska)
Nederlands (nederländska)
Norsk (norska)
Polski (polska)
Português (Portugisiska – Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugisiska - Brasilien)
Română (rumänska)
Русский (ryska)
Suomi (finska)
Türkçe (turkiska)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamesiska)
Українська (Ukrainska)
Rapportera problem med översättningen
There is no such thing as a 'pure' ipv6 since most of the internet ist still ipv4 you still have to be able to support ipv4 in some way if you connect to the internet.
The most is not all and how long have the most conections still IPv4? I will still gaming games from today in 5-10 Years and tunneling is not Performant.
It exisit no reason to wait with the IPv6 Implementation.
This is especially going to be a problem in fast-growing places like China; either you move over to IPv6 wholesale, or you get stuck with an awful IPv4 network topology that may involve multiple levels of NAT.
Companies should right now be updating their software to support IPv6. In many cases, it'll be as simple as making the data structure used to store IP addresses longer.
I have allready IPv6 since 1-2 Years, without i ask.
Yes, and Valve are careless if there do not work at IPv6 Implementation.
http://www.webopedia.com/DidYouKnow/Internet/ipv6_ipv4_difference.html
As the only difference seems to be the length of the IP address uses with no performance increase or any other reason beyond increasing the number of IP addresses available, there is no hurry for the net to change except to sell more domains that use IP addresses.
Your set-up may be IPv6, but that does not mean your ISP uses it. Mine is also IPv6, but any time I check my IP on a site, it shows as an IPv4 since that is what my ISP assigns me.
http://www.whatsmyip.org/
http://test-ipv6.com/
How is it careless? Why should they if the only difference is the number of IP addresses available?
It would help if you explained your reasoning behind it instead of just stating your opinion.
This means that starting very soon, people who need IP addresses won't be able to get them any more. That'll have really serious consequences for the future of the Internet, especially in the fast-growing and developing parts of the world. If you can't address the hosts, you can't route the traffic, then you don't have a network any more.
As the problem of IPv4 exhaustion rolls on, more and more people will either have only IPv6 connectivity, or horribly broken IPv4 connectivity, behind layers of NATs. That's not a sustainable future for the Internet. This is already starting to become a problem in some parts of the world, as they started out with far fewer IPv4 addresses than we're allocated to North America.
What companies can do is set up their software and services so that it can work with both IPv6 and IPv4. For example you can access Google, Facebook, Bing, Yahoo etc. over IPv6 today, if you have IPv6 connectivity.
See sites like this: http://www.worldipv6launch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ipv6-launchiversary.png for more information.
People who run services have a responsibility to be ready for this transition, especially if they're planning to serve areas of the world that are already starting to feel the pinch. Asia-Pacific (including China) is a great example of this.