Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Virtual cards are pretty much worthless anyway. No big loss on either end.
I agree, but perhaps it wouldn't be so bad to reduce/drop a few cooldowns if one has the mobile authenticator already enabled for some time.
It's the kind of incentive that could push more and more people to look into it.
it was already explained bazillion times as to why is it necessary
also you could have just searched for the million other threads that was made about this already
well i think that my mobile authentication, old password authentication and old gmail authentication is good enough.
That shows clearly, that the added security is total useless. We all are not able to make foolproof systems. And it angers the intelligent customers, because Valve thinks they are ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, too.
Maybe an intelligence test as entrance exam for allowing to disable the added security would make more sense. I have no problem with that.