Unable to change email to an airmail.cc address?

[fun guy]

Why?

[Nx Machina]

Blanc původně napsal:

I just blocked the troll, and I recommend others new here do the same. Tired of all this ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥, just want an Steam issue resolved for ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ once.

Every time someone disagrees with you, you take the default position of block the troll and ask others to do the same. Whether it is in this instance about email or the Steam Client. When you do this any credibility is lost with regard to the points you raise.

You are free to choose any email provider BUT Valve and any other company can block and not allow that email address to be used.

Are Valve anti consumer or simply having the same right to choose as you and have very good reasons to block the email provider.

Conspiracy is all well and good but who then do you turn to when things go wrong?

[Judgmental Amaterasu]

Blanc původně napsal:

crunchyfrog původně napsal:

And again, how does that dispute the point?

It absolutely doesn't.

For one, the point still stands. they need money to run. And more importantly, this is why you're misguided. You seem to be overly fearful or protective of something that isn't worth worrying that much about, but then with ZERO BLOODY evidence, you'll give this provider stuff because they SAY they're not about that.

Question yourself - do you think you can run stuff like this purely on donations? Nope. They would have to be EXTREMELY popular? Now ask yourself how they got that reputation of being dodgy by security experts?

I don't know maybe, just maybe it's because they're fleecing people like you and selling your data?

I'm not saying this is definitely what is happeneing. I'm trying to illustrate your TERRIBLY FLAWED thought process.

I'm tired of dealing with people like you.

If you have nothing relevant to the issue at hand, which is a good email provider being unfairly blocked because the hostname used to be used for sketch stuff, then don't ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ post anything

You're the one that dragged random political crap into a question about an email domain. If you can't stand the fire get out of the kitchen.

[crunchyfrog]

Blanc původně napsal:

crunchyfrog původně napsal:

Nah, why Valve do this is to stop dodgy ♥♥♥♥ going on. They also block a whole load of things. Go and look at the dodgy key reseller sites and try to type them in here (I would tell you what they are but I don't want to for obviious reasons).

Again, this isn't JUST a Valve thing though - as pointed out by others, that site has a poor reputation, and I'm more inclined (as you should be) to believe a load of security professionals whose very careers are based on this, over a group of anonymous party/parties that say "honest guv, I won't sell your data" and offer no evidence of it.

Valve basically just block anything that could lead users being fleeced, stolen from, or otherwise scammed or hurt in some way.

I don't think places with sketchy names like howtofix.guide, or bestsecuritysearch.com, etc are run by a load of security professionals. Even then, it's the same as if someone used a Gmail, or Yahoo, or mail.com address for the same thing, but nobody would pay attention, because "big company good, small company bad". This is entering shill territory if you believe that the big companies won't ♥♥♥♥ you at every opportunity to get money out of you.

Also, how liberal are you all really if you get offended by this and want to restrict users e-mail domain choices? Isn't the entire liberal ideology based upon more choices?

For a start I'm not offended and I don't know why you'd think that. That's daft. You CANNOT judge my mood from mere text.

That's really childishly naive.

No, I'm not at all annoyed, bothered, offended or even remotely moved. I'm merely advising you of FACT. I never even stated I agreed with it, did I?

I made NO stance on it.

And I'm not liberal, I'm left. I know that confuses some Americans with their twisted system, but that's strictly what I am (generally Labour or Green Party).

And no, the ideology is not based on "more choices". That's NOTHING to do with the left at all. The difference between the left and the right are simlpy this - the right takes the stance that everyone should be independently responsible for their own well being, if you will, so they keep as much of their income as possible and pay their own way for any misfortune or pitfalls that come their way.
The left takes the stance rather like insurance - that you put a bit of money into tax to pay for the eventuality that should things go wrong or you suffer misfortune, there is this "insurance" to pay for it.

This is why us in countries with socialistic things have health services that costs next to nothing. Because we pay for it through small taxes. Last time I went into hospital, for example, I called out an ambulance, chose to go to the hospital of my choice, where they had me in A&E dosed up for a couple of hours before being scanned and going up to a ward for 3 days before finally going home one evening in a taxi they called for me. Fed well in all that time too. Tiotal cost ZERO, including the taxi.

Because I'm on benefits I pay about £2 tax per month. But there's other small taxes like VAT on goods.

That's the difference, not choices. I don't know where you got made idea from.


In any case, none of this changes the fact that I was advising you of fact, and my mood had nothing to do with anything in any case.

[kanyaka]

vtf

[-ᴅᴇᴛᴏɴᴀ- ϟ]

crunchyfrog původně napsal:

Blanc původně napsal:

Donations, the main page shows they have gotten about 0.868BTC YTD with about 0.301BTC YTD of expenses

And again, how does that dispute the point?

It absolutely doesn't.

For one, the point still stands. they need money to run. And more importantly, this is why you're misguided. You seem to be overly fearful or protective of something that isn't worth worrying that much about, but then with ZERO BLOODY evidence, you'll give this provider stuff because they SAY they're not about that.

Question yourself - do you think you can run stuff like this purely on donations? Nope. They would have to be EXTREMELY popular? Now ask yourself how they got that reputation of being dodgy by security experts?

I don't know maybe, just maybe it's because they're fleecing people like you and selling your data?

I'm not saying this is definitely what is happeneing. I'm trying to illustrate your TERRIBLY FLAWED thought process.

nice

[NO_NO_NO_FEAR]

hey, I'm sorry to bother you, but I currently want to register an email on this website but it only lets to do that if you enter an invite key. Could you, in any way, share the invite key with me?