I can't see my total spend

[Prince Slug]

I want to know how much I spent on Steam, but the total spend is missing. Only the Old Spend option is there.

[tennex]

Iam not sure if there is something like total spend

[Prince Slug]

Escrito originalmente por Wecro:

Iam not sure if there is something like total spend

There is. Valve removed it. Now, there's only old spend, purchases before 2015, showing.
You go to steam support and check external funds to see how much you've spent. Valve removed it this year as Covid became an issue, which kinda urks me during this economic crisis.

[rawWwRrr]

Escrito originalmente por Marshy:

which kinda urks me during this economic crisis.

How is knowing how much you've spent on Steam in the past going to help you at all during an economic crisis that is happening now? You can't track your finances on your own?

Your purchases are still there in your account.

https://store.steampowered.com/account/history/

Extract the information from that.

[Prince Slug]

Escrito originalmente por rawWwRrr:

Escrito originalmente por Marshy:

which kinda urks me during this economic crisis.

How is knowing how much you've spent on Steam in the past going to help you at all during an economic crisis that is happening now? You can't track your finances on your own?

Your purchases are still there in your account.

https://store.steampowered.com/account/history/

Extract the information from that.

What is with Steam users and not wanting ease?
Just put back total spend. Why did they remove it?
Now, I have to go through ever individual purchase and refund I've made and market place transaction.

[Thrasher]

U can see ur total spent here:
https://help.steampowered.com/en/login/?redir=%2Fen%2Faccountdata%2FAccountSpend

[Prince Slug]

Escrito originalmente por def nick():

U can see ur total spent here:
https://help.steampowered.com/en/login/?redir=%2Fen%2Faccountdata%2FAccountSpend

It only shows old spend.

[Prince Slug]

Escrito originalmente por Nightenhelser:

Escrito originalmente por Marshy:

It only shows old spend.

https://steamdb.info/calculator/76561198031681905/?cc=us

That doesn't show how much I've spent. Only what I could've possibly spent, without taking bundles into account.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Marshy:

Escrito originalmente por rawWwRrr:

How is knowing how much you've spent on Steam in the past going to help you at all during an economic crisis that is happening now? You can't track your finances on your own?

Your purchases are still there in your account.

https://store.steampowered.com/account/history/

Extract the information from that.

What is with Steam users and not wanting ease?
Just put back total spend. Why did they remove it?
Now, I have to go through ever individual purchase and refund I've made and market place transaction.

Actually, that's a logical fallacy because you're assuming that's the purpose.

How did you exclude other factors you can't possibly know about? How did you determine that this wasn't a legal issue? How did you determine it wasn't something else? You can't.

I get you're most likely being tongue in cheek, but I metnion because well, it IS relevant.

There may have been faults with the old system and that's why they stopped it. Personally, I just keep a note of all my purchases whatever the platform (because I have to provide an inventory for my insurance every year, so it's no great shakes to do that).

[Callahan420]

My total spend shows at the page provided.

[cSg|mc-Hotsauce]

It is missing for some and not for others. No idea why.

[Dr.Shadowds 🐉]

https://help.steampowered.com/en/accountdata/AccountSpend

Escrito originalmente por cSg|mc-Hotsauce:

It is missing for some and not for others. No idea why.

I thought the thing got pushed from new into the old total, unless I'm confusing something here idk.

[Prince Slug]

wtf now I see my total spend. Now I can cry in peace. :)

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Marshy:

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

Actually, that's a logical fallacy because you're assuming that's the purpose.

I never stated it's purpose. I stated what it did for me. You're just being incredibly assumptious. I'm asking why they removed it and I'm trying to figure it out.
All you're doing is stating opinion with no real answers.

I'm sorry but you are woefully confused.

I haven't made ANY assumptions or claims. I take the default position - I have made NO decision about what is actually happening. I was merely pointing out that yours is an arguemnt from personal incredulity fallacy.

The two ones I offered were considerations, not MY opinions, because again, I haven't made any opinion about this.

And it's presumptious, not assumptious.

Please do Google the "arguemtn from personal incredulity fallacy" and "the default position" of philosophy to get a better understanding.

Please take it as intended - a note of help to enable you to evaluate things better in future. I'm in no way having a go.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Marshy:

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

I'm sorry but you are woefully confused.

I haven't made ANY assumptions or claims. I take the default position - I have made NO decision about what is actually happening. I was merely pointing out that yours is an arguemnt from personal incredulity fallacy.

The two ones I offered were considerations, not MY opinions, because again, I haven't made any opinion about this.

And it's presumptious, not assumptious.

Please do Google the "arguemtn from personal incredulity fallacy" and "the default position" of philosophy to get a better understanding.

Please take it as intended - a note of help to enable you to evaluate things better in future. I'm in no way having a go.

Potato Potato. I don't give a ♥♥♥♥ anymore.

We;;. you cared enough to respond, so I did.

And consider that responses on here aren't just for YOU. These are after all, discussions pages, and I always tailor my responses for everyone including those that lurk, and future readers.

That's why I went on about the logical fallacies - because myths spread like wildfire on here.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Marshy:

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

We;;. you cared enough to respond, so I did.

And consider that responses on here aren't just for YOU. These are after all, discussions pages, and I always tailor my responses for everyone including those that lurk, and future readers.

That's why I went on about the logical fallacies - because myths spread like wildfire on here.

Whatever. You're still wrong in everything you've said. You're not presumptious. You're being assumptious because you've assumed I've stated what Valve intended it for instead of what it did for me. You're just derailing the subject.

Sorry, I'm not going further with this as it's clear you don't understand. As I said, I meremly pointed out this basic logic to stop others making the mistake.

I have made NO assumptions. Critiquing YOUR claims is no assumption on my part, and can never be.

If you said you didn't like the colour blue because it causes cancer, I could point out that was flawed because there's no evidence that it does. Does that mean I agree that it does cause cancer, or that it doesn't?

Neither. Because I've made no claim. Basic epistemology which you are free to check. But again, not going further as you clearly don't understand it.