Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You go to steam support and check external funds to see how much you've spent. Valve removed it this year as Covid became an issue, which kinda urks me during this economic crisis.
Your purchases are still there in your account.
https://store.steampowered.com/account/history/
Extract the information from that.
Just put back total spend. Why did they remove it?
Now, I have to go through ever individual purchase and refund I've made and market place transaction.
https://help.steampowered.com/en/login/?redir=%2Fen%2Faccountdata%2FAccountSpend
Actually, that's a logical fallacy because you're assuming that's the purpose.
How did you exclude other factors you can't possibly know about? How did you determine that this wasn't a legal issue? How did you determine it wasn't something else? You can't.
I get you're most likely being tongue in cheek, but I metnion because well, it IS relevant.
There may have been faults with the old system and that's why they stopped it. Personally, I just keep a note of all my purchases whatever the platform (because I have to provide an inventory for my insurance every year, so it's no great shakes to do that).
I thought the thing got pushed from new into the old total, unless I'm confusing something here idk.
I haven't made ANY assumptions or claims. I take the default position - I have made NO decision about what is actually happening. I was merely pointing out that yours is an arguemnt from personal incredulity fallacy.
The two ones I offered were considerations, not MY opinions, because again, I haven't made any opinion about this.
And it's presumptious, not assumptious.
Please do Google the "arguemtn from personal incredulity fallacy" and "the default position" of philosophy to get a better understanding.
Please take it as intended - a note of help to enable you to evaluate things better in future. I'm in no way having a go.
We;;. you cared enough to respond, so I did.
And consider that responses on here aren't just for YOU. These are after all, discussions pages, and I always tailor my responses for everyone including those that lurk, and future readers.
That's why I went on about the logical fallacies - because myths spread like wildfire on here.
Sorry, I'm not going further with this as it's clear you don't understand. As I said, I meremly pointed out this basic logic to stop others making the mistake.
I have made NO assumptions. Critiquing YOUR claims is no assumption on my part, and can never be.
If you said you didn't like the colour blue because it causes cancer, I could point out that was flawed because there's no evidence that it does. Does that mean I agree that it does cause cancer, or that it doesn't?
Neither. Because I've made no claim. Basic epistemology which you are free to check. But again, not going further as you clearly don't understand it.