Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Shader at low, no FXAA, vsync, motion blur gives the best performance(might be missing something).Textures, details and all that stuff doesnt effect fps at all. 3kliksphilip video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ns9srRoDop8
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ytsLz0VTgYs This guy gets 100 fps with same gpu but better cpu and ram.
So, upgrade ram?
That it runs better on his laptop is not surprising, considering the Source engine is heavily CPU dependent. Better CPU means better performance in Source engine games.
Although, i'd recommend a RAM upgrade it wouldn't make the game run faster, but the whole system run smoother.
8GB would be the sweet spot for your laptop.
For reference a laptop with i7 4700MQ and GTX 765M was just about equivalent to my old i5 650 with GTX 750 Ti (which maybe should have been called GTX 850 Ti, since it was a Maxwell chip that was newer and more efficient than any of the other 7XX series (750 was introduced along with with GTX 970 & 980). But I guess the 8XX series were laptops only.
I am currently running a GTX 1060 @ 1080p (in Linux) on my desktop PC.