Instal Steam
login
|
bahasa
简体中文 (Tionghoa Sederhana)
繁體中文 (Tionghoa Tradisional)
日本語 (Bahasa Jepang)
한국어 (Bahasa Korea)
ไทย (Bahasa Thai)
Български (Bahasa Bulgaria)
Čeština (Bahasa Ceko)
Dansk (Bahasa Denmark)
Deutsch (Bahasa Jerman)
English (Bahasa Inggris)
Español - España (Bahasa Spanyol - Spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (Bahasa Spanyol - Amerika Latin)
Ελληνικά (Bahasa Yunani)
Français (Bahasa Prancis)
Italiano (Bahasa Italia)
Magyar (Bahasa Hungaria)
Nederlands (Bahasa Belanda)
Norsk (Bahasa Norwegia)
Polski (Bahasa Polandia)
Português (Portugis - Portugal)
Português-Brasil (Bahasa Portugis-Brasil)
Română (Bahasa Rumania)
Русский (Bahasa Rusia)
Suomi (Bahasa Finlandia)
Svenska (Bahasa Swedia)
Türkçe (Bahasa Turki)
Tiếng Việt (Bahasa Vietnam)
Українська (Bahasa Ukraina)
Laporkan kesalahan penerjemahan
Most people would look back on that dumb thing they pasted 6 years ago, reflect on how much they have grown as a person since then, realize some of their own mistakes and laugh at how foolish their younger selves were. But oh boy, not you. You're still super proud of how cringe you were, so proud that you seem to honestly still believe that anyone who doesn't reduce themselves to your level should be embarrassed by their own rationality, common sense, and basic knowledge.
And the best part is, you go on to try and argue your point, you find you have no better argument than grade school insults. You've had 6 years to think about why you should be able to search for people by their old usernames which may not even be stored anywhere, why the search system should only produce exact matches and never produce best guesses that come close, and what method Valve should use to magically know which user out of millions you specifically want.
And the best you could come up with looks like it was written by a small child who just discovered they can talk smack online without getting punched in the face and is just so excited to try it out.
But sure. I'm the one who should be embarrassed. lol. You go on thinking that while the rest of us have a good laugh waiting for the mods to lock this.
What do you mean know nothing about? Why would you assume that and what does that have to do with anything? I wanted to find a person. I know their exact steam name. Steam search does not allow me to find their steam account. That is bad design. End of.
If you typed "Milka chocolate" in google and google would show you 1 million pages of milk chocolate instead, you would be upset too.
Utterly wrong. I blame(d) steam devs for not allowing me to search names people are using right now, at this very moment. Because the search function is flawed. The guy that revived this thread right above you confirms this. An issue still unresolved 6 years later.
How can I add someone this way if I did not recently play with them?
That is not what anyone is doing tho. I was searching a user by their current name, and search won't display their name, even tho I typed it exactly and correctly.
The example was provided: If you want to find a user named *Felix* and type it exactly like that, it will show you every single user named Felix instead. It's pretty clear as to what is the issue. The only silly thing here are your replies.
Very poor reading comprehension on your part.
And what's with all the dim assumptions? Who acts like that over a 6 year old steam forum thread? Maybe you need a therapist.
Either way, you are embarrassing yourself further with every additional wall of text, each of which are based on flawed assumptions and poor reading comprehension.
I did a bit of coding decades ago and I can say with confidence that some areas of the client and correlating systems ♥♥♥♥ like the vacuum of space. A LOT of this stuff has been done so much better decades ago... yet Valve insists on reinventing the wheel. And making it a triangle...
I also liked the part where you insisted that "someone I once knew" must be using the same name they were using when you knew them. How do you know the current display name on their profile if your entire premise is that you can't find their profile and therefore can't see that information?
I also really liked the part where you suggest you couldn't possibly have added them when you had played with them via the recently played with tab because you hadn't played with them recently at the time when you played with them. What nonsense.
But I will say it has been very entertaining, kid. However, it is starting to feel like I'm punching down though since your best retorts fail to form a coherent thought while also deciding that everyone who disagrees with you must be whatever grade school insult you can think of at the moment. It's juvenile.
The fact of the matter is that what you wanted was unreasonable and absurd then, and it is unreasonable and absurd now. And the harder you stomp your feet and make things up to try and justify your point, the more silly you look. I mean, for goodness sake man, you've reached the point where you're insisting you know what is on their profile but don't have access to their profile. And in the same post, you're insisting that you couldn't have added them when you had played with them because after playing with them you hadn't recently played with them. Do you hear yourself? I think that might be a major role in why you're working so hard to project onto me right now. Maybe some part of you realizes that you're making no sense, and so you're getting frustrated with that and attacking me instead, accusing me of just not understanding.
I do hope one day, you grow to the point where you can look back at your younger self and be embarrassed. Though the lack of progress you've shown thus far is discouraging. Good luck regardless.
Do you have some sort of mental issue?
Search is broken, and 6 years ago I was frustrated about it, because I could not add a person I wanted to add. The why and how don't matter.
The search still does not function as intended. And you are sitting here trying to argue for the sake of arguing, while being intellectually dishonest, immature and petty. And you somehow think you "won" something.
Do you have any self awareness whatsoever? What even is your goal here? You are not even trying to argue about the search function, you are just a bitter old man telling me what I know, when you have no idea what I actually know.
I mean, you are calling my wish for a simple search function to work properly "absurd" and "unreasonable". That is the equivalent of saying: "Typing milka chocolate on google should not automatically lead you to milkas website. Expecting that to happen is absurd and unreasonable. You should have to look at 1 million results about milk chocolate instead".
You are the least intelligent person pretending to be intelligent I talked to so far this year
Let's take one example: User is called "Felix ^^". That is a unique username.
Search function will instead show a 100000 Felixes.
Yes yes, it is very unreasonable of me to ask for search to account for the exact letters and symbols I type. And yes I am definitely a stalker for wanting search to work. What is wrong with you?
The username, likely, isn't 100% accurate to what you're searching.
Of course the issue is less prevalent for less common names like mine. That much should be obvious. But it's still there