Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
1. Attention seeking.
2. They're bored with the game, they had enough so they want to ban themselves.
This is actually a thing in a rhythm game that I play. Lots of top players banned themselves for such reasons.
Enjoyment may sound strange, but there are people out there who take joy in ruining another's experience or causing another frustration. And a sense of joy out of getting revenge over someone who outskills you, even if it required cheating. I imagine you'll even find people who do it simply just to see if they can get away with it as well.
On the other side it's demoralising and puts people off the game which is why publishers and Steam need to be far more aggressive in combating cheats. It's not enough to merely ban cheats - they need to be tracking down and prosecuting (unauthorised interference with a computer programme is a criminal offence) and suing the people and sites who are selling and distributing them.
S.x.
While I don't think cheating should be a criminal matter, I certainly can see a case for civil, but it's just not worth going after people on the individual level.
Distributors on the other hand have been successfully taken to court. Riot and Blizzard have both won cases in this area in the last two years, so there's certainly precedent.. In the case of Riot they were awarded $10 million even, albeit that case invlolved more than just the tool being distributed for cheating.
Someone in the UK went to jail for hacking, Call of Duty 4 I think, and crashing the servers at launch.
S.x.
But most the time it's some little 12 year old that thinks it's k00l to cheat and think they won't get caught.
Looking at the ban list on TF 2 I think it was endemic through a large section of the player base. I think it was the feeling that it could be done with impunity that led people to do it.
S.x.
Yes, if someone is bringing a server down, especially in an extremely popular game, I could see them pursuing it. He was charged under the Computer Misuse act, specifically because it is illegal to impair the access or operation of a program/computer or to own/create software that can launch DDoS attacks. Most forms of cheating wouldn't actually fall under this act though as they don't actually have an impact on the game's ability to run or people's ability to access it.
Unauthorised acts with intent to impair, or with recklessness as to impairing, operation of computer, etc.
.
(1)
A person is guilty of an offence if—
.
(a)
he does any unauthorised act in relation to a computer;
.
(b)
at the time when he does the act he knows that it is unauthorised; and
.
(c)
either subsection (2) or subsection (3) below applies.
.
(2)
This subsection applies if the person intends by doing the act—
.
(a)
to impair the operation of any computer;
.
(b)
to prevent or hinder access to any program or data held in any computer; [F8or]
.
(c)
to impair the operation of any such program or the reliability of any such data; [F9or
.
(d)
to enable any of the things mentioned in paragraphs (a) to (c) above to be done.]]
Most cheat programs would fall foul of (2)(c).
S.x.
So being curious is considered flame bait now? What has this world come to...