安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
NOPE! That's not how it works. You were the first one to write that steam did not have a refund policy before 2015. You said it first. You must prove your statement since you wrote it first. I'm the challenger. I do not have to prove anything, you do. I challenge you to prove your claim true.
EWrm yes it is that is exactly how burden of proof works.
YOU assert there was a refund policy before this. I don't believe your claim.
The burden of proof is on YOU. I cannot provide evidence for something I haven't said as that's not how it works.
The person asserting the positive claim ALWAYS has burden of proof. Read for yourself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)
So unless you demosntrate evidence of what you claim it must be dismissed as bollocks.
You do not get to just write blanket claims like that without proof. Either prove it or it didn't happen.
Example.
https://i.imgur.com/PHALr9T.png
But you could, but at the same time, could not.
I would also add, this was everyone back then too, not just Steam. Some still do not like Blizzard if ya played it.
Refund system isn't to demo games.
I didn't play them at ALL, though, so they weren't exactly "demos". They were impulse purchases. And if I get banned from refunding over ten dollar indecisiveness every few months or less, I'll just switch platforms or appeal the ban a year later or something.
And this was less about "research" and more about the fact I suddenly deleted my library of about 5 pirated games, so I don't want mediocre ones that were peer pressure impulse purchases versus tried and true ones if they get in the way of legally purchasing the ones I really want. Palworld is fine to not be refunded, but Webfishing and TFC are mid to the point where I regretted purchasing them in under 24 hours of purchase. I don't refund other kinds of purchases much at all unless they're defective (I've had moments of buyer's remorse for my 1080p 144hz monitor + 4060 setup, but the more I sit on it, I realize it's fine and ~250 more dollars of upgrades could make it excellent), but I'm stricter about digital games because it's easier to impulse buy them and harder to sell them in the future. When I'm buying something that's not an asset, I hold less value to it and am more likely to refund it. There's the marketing data for marketing researchers reading this thread, if any exist.
This has all the energy of attempting to rules lawyer your way out of behavior you know is breaking thre rules
If it's breaking the rules to do it every once in a blue moon, that sux, since many competitors take about a day to get the products shipped out and you can occasionally request cancellation, and many physical products accept returns within 30 days. It's not like the payment got sent to the devs yet. I've taken the time to request a speedy refund, and there's ZERO install or playtime on record, so if that's "abuse", and it goes beyond not getting refunded to actually getting BANNED from the PriVILEgE of getting refunds, then we live in a corporate dystopia where it's pretty much just as bad as before Steam even HAD refunds.
For reference, I've only tried to refund 40 dollars of product out of around 90 dollars of total purchases, or about 3 games of about 7, with two of the games yesterday and one game almost a month ago. The 30 dollar product refund got denied and I accepted that, as I fell outside the window, so I can't abuse a process if it didn't get me a result. Intentions be damned, because the lack of a refund would be the punishment in that case, like no need for extra on top of that.
As shown here above.
I was just informing you, that too many refunds flags an account from future refunds for a while.
That's fine, I just wish there was more transparency on what "an unreasonable amount" means, and that asking shouldn't be a factor (only actually refunded games), since not getting the refund seems like a reasonable enough consequence. Buyer's remorse is enough of a pain as-is. And I don't like the concept of "informed" purchasing, because all the information in the world isn't going to prevent you from being headstrong at times (like I already did months of research into Webfishing and watched a review of TFC, I just felt buyer's remorse I didn't predict at the time). If there was a stupid tax of a 25% (sometimes 50%) refund penalty behind certain reasons under certain conditions, that could be a reasonable compromise as well.
I remember seeing on YouTube that people are silently flagged as chronic refunders and eventually get denied refunds at many brick-and-mortar stores. I totally support that, as they often waive restocking fees, destroy products, etc. and it will reduce the amount of waste and improve the used goods market. And in Steam's case, the fees and whatnot could definitely rack up for them, so I get that as well. Maybe the lack of transparency is what annoys me, or the community is more against seemingly frivolous refunds than Steam itself.
Edit: I wasn't condoning (censored). I was just saying that PS4 allows you to share libraries without having to break ToS, so it's a better competitor in that regard alongside physical media. If this post gets me in trouble, I'll report the person who said discussing it wasn't allowed back, since they technically used the naughty words regardless of context as well.