Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
LMFAO
You owe me a new KB and Monitor... LOL and a new orange juice.
I agree.
I Never felt the need to necro post after doing a search in the last 29.5 years of Forum posting, and in that time, about 99.99999% of necro posts were completely frivolous and unnecessary.
Yes, it's more meaningful on live-service/MMO/etc type games (where a post from 6-12 months ago is taking about an entirely different state of a game; also applies to non-live-service games that are being actively/extensively patched). That's where the "don't want to spread confusion" thing comes from - someone necros a post from Build 16, where Tanks had such-and-such powers, but the game is on Build 18 and the entire Tanking system has been redone. People see the "Tanks suck because X" or "Tanking changed to Y" post, don't notice the date, and freak out about these Brand New Changes (which haven't been a thing for months).
If a game got an update and then some rando from the other side of the world decide they want to add to a discussion which is not relevant since months or even possibly years then yes - it really actually do prevent confusion to just close the thread. The rando can start a new one if they still wish to discuss something.
it's either outright incorrect info, something someone else already said, or just straight up spam