Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
Same reason that current Steam client cannot work on Windows 98, ME, 2000, XP. :)
(while it was in fact possible at various points in the past.. but not anymore)
The reasons I gave are utterly valid because we've seen it times before. I don't know what part of that you don't understand.
The fact remains that my analogy was clear - the longer time goes on, the more something needs maintenance to keep it secure or operating. This is demonstrably true for OSes.
So now you extend that to someone like Valve, who are somewhat secondary to this and have to work WITHIN that OS that requires this maintenance. It compounds THEIR maintenance too.
So you're so easily wrong, it's painful to see.
Consider this - if you're so confident there's no reason for them not to, how about you demonstrate your evidence why.
steam emulator works on win 7 while steam doesn't. That's all everyone needs to know
Non sequiturs mean nothing to the point about you can't keep patching up things that aren't supported anymore.
The fact something works and something else doens't shows NOTHING except reinforces my point. It shows that things WILL break.
Honestly, I had a much better time with 8.1 compared to 7 on every single system I owned before I moved to 10 and later on 11. but if 8.1 was still supported by most applications and games then I would have kept on using it.
The terrible UI could be fixed easily through ClassicShell (now called OpenShell) so you got yourself a proper start menu without this touch nonsense
Where did I say anything like that?
I clearly said in repsonse to someone saying that there's no excuse for NOT infintely supprting old OSes, that they were wrong and that you can't keep propping up and patching old OSes as it gets exponentially problematic.
How did you mangle that to "they've got the reverse Midas touch"?
My experience was pretty much the same. 8.1 has some nice & needed improvements but it's a shame about driver / community support ... and that UI BS should have been OPTIONAL.
Bonjour
I'm sorry but I have no idea what you're talking about, I don't believe I ever mentioned that or said that I was going to explain any of that? Perhaps you meant to reply this to someone else?
I don't like Windows 11 either
Of course you can get a Steam emulator yourself, but Steam are definitely obliged to keep their games playable even when the OS platform has stopped evolving.
When all the W10 become "too old" and un-upgradable because of W11 artificial hardware requirements, this is going to explode at the latest.
not really agree as steam is just a third party resseler but not the maker of most games you can purchase here.
For the other part, people will discover that by themselv with time i guess.
It's not just steam, all major platforms, game engines and other software that uses the Chromium Embedded Framework (CEF) has dropped support for windows 7, steam just happens to be the last platform to drop support.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromium_Embedded_Framework