Steam 설치
로그인
|
언어
简体中文(중국어 간체)
繁體中文(중국어 번체)
日本語(일본어)
ไทย(태국어)
Български(불가리아어)
Čeština(체코어)
Dansk(덴마크어)
Deutsch(독일어)
English(영어)
Español - España(스페인어 - 스페인)
Español - Latinoamérica(스페인어 - 중남미)
Ελληνικά(그리스어)
Français(프랑스어)
Italiano(이탈리아어)
Bahasa Indonesia(인도네시아어)
Magyar(헝가리어)
Nederlands(네덜란드어)
Norsk(노르웨이어)
Polski(폴란드어)
Português(포르투갈어 - 포르투갈)
Português - Brasil(포르투갈어 - 브라질)
Română(루마니아어)
Русский(러시아어)
Suomi(핀란드어)
Svenska(스웨덴어)
Türkçe(튀르키예어)
Tiếng Việt(베트남어)
Українська(우크라이나어)
번역 관련 문제 보고
In this case, FACTS are, openly hateful rhetoric targeting demographics will lead to a ban. Even if someone FEELS persecuted by said ban.
AKA individuals who've made political brainrot their entire personalities.
Decent oath frankly.
When dealing with others, I tend to take the approach that I respond how you treat me, and I treat everybody on their own merits regardless.
I feel this would be above certain people.
I once got called at the same minute an 'alt-right nazi bigot' and a 'woke snowflake communist', because I sent both sides of a heated argument to the cooling down corner. Fun times.
Who is targeting right leaning en masse?
Where's your actual evidence of this, and is it correct? Because what I've seen is usually loudmouth, ignorant, rude, unedacted or misinformed people spouting stuff that's either directly against the rules or just plain antagonisitc.
And then they cry when they receive the correct consequences and say things just like you've said. "I'm being attacked".
I mean The crusades were all about CHristian on Muslim violence.
As for the OP.
I think Tito pretty much nailed it.
A toxic toad is a toxic toad regardless of who they vote for.
And Toxic toads get ban hammered.