Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Valve doesn't want to sell a product with certain content.
A company removed said content because they want to use Steam's distribution to sell their product.
Valve then sells the product, and wants to promote said product to the customers with events.
Hypocrisy would be Valve publicly opposing the unedited product while also selling the unedited product.
Now, who is offering the patch fix? Valve? The devs? Is the patch offered within Steam's framework?
Now that I think of it, what is the removed content? If it is removed but it still sells was that particular content important? Was the content the entire reason for the game itself?
This makes me curious.
I do not follow the VN genre, so I would like clarification.
Are you saying that the edited VN is released, but a patch is offered within Steam?
Or are you saying that Valve has started to sell unedited VNs?
Both, I would assume.
I've seen VNs that offer the 18+ content as DLC (often as free DLC). It is still hidden by the filter as well, for those with out Adult Content enabled.
And there are ones that are Adult Only on the main store page.
Visual novels are games.
All age versions of visual novels exist far longer then steam, so... you complain to the wrong source.