Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
It's not difficult for users to leave negative reviews on projects deemed abandoned or for users to ignore these games. It's certainly not a violation of Valve's SteamWorks policy and not every title that has gone this way has done so for fraudulent means.
This, i mean most new businesses don't succeed. Its not fraud when that happens especially when you are explicitly made aware of it.
A: Sometimes things don't work out as you planned, and you may need to discontinue development of your Early Access game before you are ready for a V1.0 release. If this happens, you can contact Valve to figure out the next steps. There are two options:
If your Early Access game is playable and well received, but you're unable to develop it to the point where you feel it warrants a full V1.0 release, then we can keep your game on the Store, but otherwise remove it from Early Access. This will remove the Early Access tag and Early Access Q&A displayed on your game’s Store Page, but not start the launch visibility that comes with definitively releasing your game out of Early Access. This would be a permanent change; we aren’t able to reenable Early Access again later, so please consider this option carefully before contacting us with the details. In this case, you should let your community know about your decision to leave Early Access via a forum post or news event.
Alternatively, we can remove your Early Access game from Steam. Before reaching out, you should read about the process of removing a game from Steam and take a moment to carefully consider whether or not pulling your game down is actually the right choice. Are you acting based on an emotional response to negative feedback, or is retiring your game the appropriate next step? We take our relationship with customers seriously, so if you choose to cancel development of a game and retire it from the store, we will not republish it again later and we may offer refunds to any users who purchased it. Treating customers fairly is the most important thing to us.
The game is dead and continued to be sold under the pretense of active development. That is deceitful intent for the purpose of profit.
fraud
[frôd]
noun
**wrongful** OR criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain:
Like selling something under the promise it "might" one day see completion when clearly it never will?
Except its not. It literally tells you that it might never update on the store page. That is the exact opposite of the pretense of active development.
Simple solution though, go into your store preferences and disable seeing EA games.
If that was the case then there wouldn't be a clear warning TELLING you that it might never get updated and to not buy it unless you were happy with it as is...
Defending steam on principle alone? This is what Early Access is when it is launched.. while it is ACTIVE.
Do you not grasp the concept that a game no longer being developed is not active and therefore needs to have the Early Access tag remove. Hence the text i posted directly from the Steam Works FAQ on what a developer should do "if their EA does not work out"
Failing to follow through with that final close out process with they QUIT working on the game, is merely to draw revenue in perpetuity based on a fallacy.
At the very least there should be a steam ticket to prompt evaluation on whether or not it is still actively in EA.
Trying to claim that early access applies years after development shut down is asinine.
Do you believe everything with a "on sale" or "organic" sticker is truly so?
Truly Organic tried the same thing. "IT IS organic, it came from the earth and has carbon"
I mean do you not grasp that doing what you suggest would be more harmful as people would think the game was finished and not realize its incomplete when they buy it?
I'm actually seriously considering if I shouldn't report this post instead, because you're now potentially misleading Steamers and trying to persuade them to mis/ab -use the reporting system. You report something when it violates the Steam TOS and/or general rules. Developers which no longer work on a game don't do that.
Not to mention that this is a pretty dumb comment in itself because.... when is a game "abandoned"? That's something only the developer would know. Some developers, especially indie studios, need time to get things done. And sometimes updates may even take one or two years.
Then what?
And the absurd misuse of the word fraud is just... stupid. People like you only make it more difficult for those who actually have or had to deal with fraud, because the misuse of the word risks devaluating the actual real problems. Pretty scummy thing to do IMO, though it's probably just another classic example of not having thought this thing through.
Just read the Steam Works agreement before you keep commenting. It is pretty simple to understand language, and Im sure there are localization for all different languages.
To keep the game under an early access tag when there is no active development for years...is exactly what you should not do in Early Access.
I can keep pasting portions of the Document show violations of best practices, steam works policy, and whatever else.
There will always be those who love to argue, align with the predatory corpo mentality, see nothing wrong with deceit, or just love defending the people that practice deceit for gain.
PS
Games that will never finish and are broken... get removed entirely. Read the FAQ
I never bought theres games, are you just some shill for steam? or maybe the devs. Ive only been burned by one early access title out of dozens.
Im a little more discerning.
Report whatever you want. You should have done that initially instead of clogging a thread with a bunch of unrelated discussion.
Im amazed that people will twist whatever is said to justify their own meritless view. Misleading who?
The game has no developement for two years and received two updates. Threads are dead over year. Who exactly am i misleading?
I've also seen instances where an early access game went dark for a year or more, only to return for further development later.
Early access is inherently a risky purchase, but as long as you understand this and make use of the information available to you, there's no reason anyone should get burned.