安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
So it's not consumer misleading or deceptive if everyone elese on Steam made a 1000 accounts or more each, and then spammed same quote reviews AI or script for every account owing DOTA 2?
In the FTC proposed rulemaking, the Commission cited examples of clearly deceptive practices involving consumer reviews and testimonials from its past cases, and noted the widespread emergence of generative AI, which is likely to make it easier for bad actors to write fake reviews.
I'd say having regularly spammed 1000 accounts DOTA 2 reviews all saying the same thing, all coming from the same accounts creator, is deceptive. Valve not removing them, as they know its happening weekly and from where, is also deceptive. But we can agree to disagree.
Still avoiding YOUR defintion of illegal.
Federal Trade Commission FTC proposed rules, on consumer reviews endorsements and testimonials are federal law.
So what is it about the definition of "illegal" do you not understand?
The federal government has every right to impose fines on to Valve for non compliance. And or even seek out any individuals behind bot farms leaving fake reviews.
What is your definition illegal? Scam? Scam are good? Deception, spam fake good?
Okay - illegal aside...
If these reviews are indeed fake or bot-generated, scripted - The Best Game -, they could be violating the platform own policies? Along with said mentioned FTC review legal regulations.
What are Valve's definitions of those policies? Lets see.
https://steamcommunity.com/groups/UKCS/members?searchKey=%F0%9D%93%A2%F0%9D%93%90%F0%9D%93%9C%F0%9D%93%A4%F0%9D%93%A1%F0%9D%93%98%F0%9D%93%94
The reviews don't lie?
YOUR defintion as YOU are the one claiming they are illegal.
Did you forget you posted:
The FTC did not post that. You did.
I could direct you to the FTC's website and information, the problem is, you wouldn't read it, maybe not understand it. You'd probably ask them what their basis or merit is for making and enforcing policy on what they consider, is illegal review, endorsements, and testimonials, activity,
They said that, not me. Done and done.
I do not need to visit the FTC website.
I want you to stand by your words and define illegal because that is YOUR CLAIM written below.
Maybe you missed you made no mention of the FTC in your original post.
Therefore the FTC has zero to do with YOUR CLAIM.
FTC has everything to do,with all of it, illegal.
Or mad that I won't define illegal?
The Best Game
https://steamcommunity.com/groups/UKCS/members?searchKey=%F0%9D%93%A2%F0%9D%93%90%F0%9D%93%9C%F0%9D%93%A4%F0%9D%93%A1%F0%9D%93%98%F0%9D%93%94
The Best Game
https://steamcommunity.com/search/users/#text=LinaCandy
I'm all for The Federal Trade Commission getting involved..
We should direct members of the Federal Trade Commission here for comments?
I'd love to see how you try and strawman and gaslight them that they cannot enforce their rules of law on illegal, deceptive review activity alt account, bot, AI, scripted.
What say you Valve? Complicit or incompetent?
Mad at you? Nope.
FTC has zero to do with it because no one from the FTC wrote your post. You did.
So we go back to YOU avoiding YOUR defintion of illegal. It cannot be that hard as YOU are convinced they are illegal fake reviews. It is YOUR CLAIM after all not the FTC.
Trust me bro is not a great defence in fact it is avoidance.
Again, I'm all for The Federal Trade Commission getting involved. They and Valve can get to the bottom of illegal reviews, really fast, IP addresses, account creation dates, user review creation dates (scripted), associated email addresses with accounts, payment information, DOTA 2 servers / IPs the associated accounts play or farm on, associated third party skin sites the accounts login to with Steam api, or associated VAC linked banned accounts, phone number associations, computer names, login locations etc etc etc, all information Valve has on user accounts. https://help.steampowered.com/en/accountdata
but trust me bro its not a great defense to act like I haven't provide you with any details
but w/e
You can rightly point to the FTC guidelines but the fact you're missing is that part where you need to prove these reviewes are fake.
You haven't done that and cannot.
What makes them fake? Valve can attribute every single one of the reviews to an account in good standing (and in most cases can vouch that they've bought a copy of the game).
"Dang, your review tho! It's packed with so much good stuff. I could never write like that. You're incredible! 🤩👌"
All that shows is that someone might have simply copy pasted and does this same response for games they like.
That's ALWAYS been a thing on the internet.