安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
This includes ensuring that they are easy to understand, do not contain any invalid clauses and, above all, do not consist entirely of stuff that is detrimental to customers with eat or die statements.
In addition, developers and publishers should be able to be warned off (with consequences in case of violations) directly as soon as a terms of use or data protection agreement says something other than what their actual product behaviour does.
There is a lot of lying, customer deception and fraud going on right now but unfortunately either favored by various laws or many developers don't care. “Legal risk” according to a developer quote who once made fun of some legal complaints. Many know that they are safe and Valve itself protects developers and often does nothing.
On the other hand, consumer rights and data protection rights that have been largely minimized or even abolished on Steam and other platforms should be further strengthened. This also includes the topics of terms of use and data protection agreements.
So everything stands and falls with the laws. Valve should actually be legally bound by the countries laws in which Steam is available and then pass this on to the developers.