how to hide games you buy?

[Vyrex]

help me please my friends can see these

https://gyazo.com/204ce677a18edeb904143d2ae42d70b8

[Chika Ogiue]

Escrito originalmente por Nebsun:

do you leave the door open when using the toilet with guests in your house ?

They're more than welcome to come and join me.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Supafly:

Escrito originalmente por Nebsun:

I wish we could choose which games are private and public, like I can choose which curtains are closed or open or I can display certain physical game boxes in the open, while having a private collection hidden away.

Just don't store them on your min account. My Dad never stored his dirty mags on the bookshelf or dirty films with every other video for the kids to see.

Yes, I get it, people would prefer to have them on a single account. However, bugs happen all the time and if you could private them individually a user wouldn't be happy if they became public for a short time due to a bug. Another account for those games eliminates that risk.

It's almost like personal responsobilty exists :)

[Supafly]

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

It's almost like personal responsobilty exists :)

Exactly. They'd rather have someone do some fairly basic stuff for us rather than take control and do it something ourselves. Kind that want/need

cars with tyre pressure sensors rather than take a moment to check themselves,
Lane change warnings to beep at you if your crossing a lane........basic learner training no longer required
Cruise control
Automatic braking
Auto highbeams
Driverless

And so on............. Just shift the responsibility elsewhere so we don't have to deal with it

[🕊️autobot]

Escrito originalmente por Supafly:

Use profile privacy settings to hide game data. Need to hide it all as you can't just hide select titles. Nothing you can do about those that have already seen and/or commented on them though

If you want to buy more maybe do so on a second account.

[Menoobslayer]

Escrito originalmente por Menoobslayer:

Escrito originalmente por Flavius Claudius Julianus:

Even if you hide it from your friends, God sees them.

Don't forget that Santa, Super Man, and whatever other ->fictional<- character you are dumb enough to believe are real are watching too!

[captainwiseass]

Just say you're playing them for the articles.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Supafly:

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

It's almost like personal responsobilty exists :)

Exactly. They'd rather have someone do some fairly basic stuff for us rather than take control and do it something ourselves. Kind that want/need

cars with tyre pressure sensors rather than take a moment to check themselves,
Lane change warnings to beep at you if your crossing a lane........basic learner training no longer required
Cruise control
Automatic braking
Auto highbeams
Driverless

And so on............. Just shift the responsibility elsewhere so we don't have to deal with it

Well I can understand the need for tyre pressure sensors as that's a good safety oversight.

But I get your point in using that example.

Yeah this amount of conveninece should be thought of as just that - CONVENIENCE. Not a right.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por captainwiseass:

Just say you're playing them for the articles.

Good one.

[Supafly]

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

Escrito originalmente por Supafly:

Exactly. They'd rather have someone do some fairly basic stuff for us rather than take control and do it something ourselves. Kind that want/need

cars with tyre pressure sensors rather than take a moment to check themselves,
Lane change warnings to beep at you if your crossing a lane........basic learner training no longer required
Cruise control
Automatic braking
Auto highbeams
Driverless

And so on............. Just shift the responsibility elsewhere so we don't have to deal with it

Well I can understand the need for tyre pressure sensors as that's a good safety oversight.

But I get your point in using that example.

Yeah this amount of conveninece should be thought of as just that - CONVENIENCE. Not a right.

Used Tyre pressure sensor because I've known people not paying attention or check pressure because their are sensors.even when the read out is ... because the sensor or readout is faulty. Watched a colleague bring a £160,000 vehicle back on a rim and part of the side wall torn because a sensor failed and they couldn't be a*** to get out and check. 8 hour shift with 6 hours of that driving so god knows how long they'd been driving on a flat. other 3 sensors were working fine. They'd been driving that vehicle every day for months and clearly got lazy.

He got suspended as I was talking with the Client and Boss when the idiot drove it into the garage at the end of his shift/start of mine. Client also banned him from any future work on their vehicles. A flat would be one thing but fact part of the sidewall was missing means he'd driven for a substantial amount of time on a tyre costing just under a grand.

But yeah you right it's a convenience. problem is people get lazy. Not hoping it happens but I'm kinda waiting for an accident on a motorway where it's due to a driver falling asleep at the wheel and their lane change warning fails so they don't hear a beep to wake them up. Or it's just not loud enough to wake them. Be a "I told you so" moment. Though it's unlikely we'd ever know that's what caused the accident as the driver could die. Still a possibility. A grim one but possible. The realist in me is showing. Hope for the best, optimistic, but fully aware the pessimistic outcome is possible.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Supafly:

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

Well I can understand the need for tyre pressure sensors as that's a good safety oversight.

But I get your point in using that example.

Yeah this amount of conveninece should be thought of as just that - CONVENIENCE. Not a right.

Used Tyre pressure sensor because I've known people not paying attention or check pressure because their are sensors.even when the read out is ... because the sensor or readout is faulty. Watched a colleague bring a £160,000 vehicle back on a rim and part of the side wall torn because a sensor failed and they couldn't be a*** to get out and check. 8 hour shift with 6 hours of that driving so god knows how long they'd been driving on a flat. other 3 sensors were working fine. They'd been driving that vehicle every day for months and clearly got lazy.

He got suspended as I was talking with the Client and Boss when the idiot drove it into the garage at the end of his shift/start of mine. Client also banned him from any future work on their vehicles. A flat would be one thing but fact part of the sidewall was missing means he'd driven for a substantial amount of time on a tyre costing just under a grand.

But yeah you right it's a convenience. problem is people get lazy. Not hoping it happens but I'm kinda waiting for an accident on a motorway where it's due to a driver falling asleep at the wheel and their lane change warning fails so they don't hear a beep to wake them up. Or it's just not loud enough to wake them. Be a "I told you so" moment. Though it's unlikely we'd ever know that's what caused the accident as the driver could die. Still a possibility. A grim one but possible. The realist in me is showing. Hope for the best, optimistic, but fully aware the pessimistic outcome is possible. :ItsBoshyTime:

Ah now those things always bring out the insurance worker side of my mind whenever they're introduced frankly.

From convenience issues like these tyre pressure sensors to Renault cheapening on bonnet catches I always think this way - who's going to be liable and how much?

I've had a tyre pressure sensor go screwy on me on my way to Glastonbury two years ago. I'd checked the tyre pressures the week before, and sure enough it said we had a slow puncture.

because my car's a motobility (disabled) car, I had to call the AA and wait for them to turn up. Turns out no flat tyre and the sensor was just kaput. Wasted a couple fo hours on that.

But I'd rather it be that way round than the other you mention.

Yeah, the problem is with human nature is that we get FAR too complacent too easily. Idiot Elon Musk thinks he can push self driving cars and just fails to recognise the massive elelphant in the room there.

[Supafly]

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

Ah now those things always bring out the insurance worker side of my mind whenever they're introduced frankly.

From convenience issues like these tyre pressure sensors to Renault cheapening on bonnet catches I always think this way - who's going to be liable and how much?

I've had a tyre pressure sensor go screwy on me on my way to Glastonbury two years ago. I'd checked the tyre pressures the week before, and sure enough it said we had a slow puncture.

because my car's a motobility (disabled) car, I had to call the AA and wait for them to turn up. Turns out no flat tyre and the sensor was just kaput. Wasted a couple fo hours on that.

But I'd rather it be that way round than the other you mention.

Yeah, the problem is with human nature is that we get FAR too complacent too easily. Idiot Elon Musk thinks he can push self driving cars and just fails to recognise the massive elelphant in the room there.

You're like me then, rather double check, to be on the safe side.

Vaguely remember us talking about disability, PIP, motability vehciles or something involving them in the past. I could get a motability car but until my current car costs more to run or I need modifications in order to drive it I'll stick with it and keep the extra money. Won't drive after 1-2pm as my double vision can worsen as the day goes on. I don't have dozens of different glasses with different strength prisms ground into the lenses to correct it. Could probably just close one eye and I'd be a better driver than some people on the road but not going to test that theory.

Thus the extra gets spent on taxis when I need them. If I took a motability car I'd lack funds to cover taxis cost at the same time. So it's either keep running my car whilst cheaper and have money for taxis or not run a car and rely on taxis.

Musk an the owners don't grasp all the details. Still new tech and you see drivers not prepared to take over if something happens. Accident waiting to happen.

[crunchyfrog]

Escrito originalmente por Supafly:

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

Ah now those things always bring out the insurance worker side of my mind whenever they're introduced frankly.

From convenience issues like these tyre pressure sensors to Renault cheapening on bonnet catches I always think this way - who's going to be liable and how much?

I've had a tyre pressure sensor go screwy on me on my way to Glastonbury two years ago. I'd checked the tyre pressures the week before, and sure enough it said we had a slow puncture.

because my car's a motobility (disabled) car, I had to call the AA and wait for them to turn up. Turns out no flat tyre and the sensor was just kaput. Wasted a couple fo hours on that.

But I'd rather it be that way round than the other you mention.

Yeah, the problem is with human nature is that we get FAR too complacent too easily. Idiot Elon Musk thinks he can push self driving cars and just fails to recognise the massive elelphant in the room there.

You're like me then, rather double check, to be on the safe side.

Vaguely remember us talking about disability, PIP, motability vehciles or something involving them in the past. I could get a motability car but until my current car costs more to run or I need modifications in order to drive it I'll stick with it and keep the extra money. Won't drive after 1-2pm as my double vision can worsen as the day goes on. I don't have dozens of different glasses with different strength prisms ground into the lenses to correct it. Could probably just close one eye and I'd be a better driver than some people on the road but not going to test that theory.

Thus the extra gets spent on taxis when I need them. If I took a motability car I'd lack funds to cover taxis cost at the same time. So it's either keep running my car whilst cheaper and have money for taxis or not run a car and rely on taxis.

Musk an the owners don't grasp all the details. Still new tech and you see drivers not prepared to take over if something happens. Accident waiting to happen.

Ah yes I remember now. I'm awful at remembering names, so cool beans :)

Yeah, that's the thing that worries me most about Musk (and other people like him in tech). They're all a massive argument from personal incredulity fallacy.

They have an idea (which often isn't a new one, especially with Elon Musk who regurgitates old ideas and dones't bother looking to see why they didn't work in the past so repeats mistakes). Then they think of a cou[ple of possible problems or downsides and think they have it cracked.

What they don't realise is half of the things, nor appreciate the things they can't foresee either.

He's no better thatn some rando pushing a dumb kickstarter.

That's why his self driving cars are so dumb. He can make that tech as watertight as he thinks (which I don't think will ever happen), and he simply either doesn't know or doesn't care either about what people will do when it's released.

It's so ridiculous because he has no appreciation that safety regulators will eat him for lunch.

It's fascinating to watch him mess up in real time though and then watch his moving of the goalposts and excuses.

[Supafly]

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

Ah yes I remember now. I'm awful at remembering names, so cool beans :)

Wasn't till you mentioned your motability vehicle that it clicked. I have enough trouble remembering soo much more than just names. Why I make silly mistakes on here daily

Escrito originalmente por crunchyfrog:

*Snipped{/quote]

He screws up just as bad as me but at least I'm not being arrogant and risking peoples lives.

I test drove a car that would take photos every time it detected obstructions. Help them design their an automatic braking/emergency stop system. All done on public roads and it'd beep when it detected obstructions and take a photo. Stationary and cars going past at a junction, roundabout and pedestrians crossing the road while I'm sat at a red. Take photos of post boxes, traffic lights, lamp posts and trees when rounding bends...... turning right and object on left side and vice versus.

One night I smacked a Fox just after 9 pm on a dark country road that shot out the bush chasing what I believe to be a rabbit. Didn't hit what it was chasing, just the Fox. 70mph impact, dragged it to the side of road and continued. Reported the incident as damage to the bumper. The client suspended me while they investigated. Didn't go so well when they asked if I had kept the roadkill as they only had my word for it and I could have hit a car or something else. I went to their compound and, got in some trouble for this, walked in a briefing with the project leader updating his superiors. Said they can replace and train someone else because my suspension is over as I exclude myself from any future projects involving them.

Said it was insulting to have him and anyone else implying I lied. If they want proof how about testing the animal fur that was still on the bumper. I know it's their as I just walked past it.....How could he not have seen it, even dried blood. Pretty sure paint would be the logicaI evidence had I hit a car. Also suggested he check the GPS tracking that would have shown my sudden breaking in the location I stated. Had I hit a car, cyclist or even a person their useless object detection software should have beeped and took a bloody photo. Turned my back and walked out with project leader trying to say something when he got told to shut up.

While I got told off for the way I handled it, my Manager was reasonable. Pretty that company would be getting sued if a customers car didn't auto brake. So that identified a serious flaw.........No wonder why I dislike all the auto **** lol

Good news was I got an apology from that company, not the ♥♥♥♥, and offered work on a different project later that day. More money for 3 months. Done plenty of jobs with them over the years and besides that project leader me and the other project leaders got on fine. Worked out quite well in the end. Shows I wasn't too bad at my job :D

Back to Musk......wonder what he'll put his foot in next