Nainstalovat Steam
přihlásit se
|
jazyk
简体中文 (Zjednodušená čínština)
繁體中文 (Tradiční čínština)
日本語 (Japonština)
한국어 (Korejština)
ไทย (Thajština)
български (Bulharština)
Dansk (Dánština)
Deutsch (Němčina)
English (Angličtina)
Español-España (Evropská španělština)
Español-Latinoamérica (Latin. španělština)
Ελληνικά (Řečtina)
Français (Francouzština)
Italiano (Italština)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonéština)
Magyar (Maďarština)
Nederlands (Nizozemština)
Norsk (Norština)
Polski (Polština)
Português (Evropská portugalština)
Português-Brasil (Brazilská portugalština)
Română (Rumunština)
Русский (Ruština)
Suomi (Finština)
Svenska (Švédština)
Türkçe (Turečtina)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamština)
Українська (Ukrajinština)
Nahlásit problém s překladem
Or it continues in offline mode.
That said, I rarely read reviews anyways because I know what kinds of games I like and don't really need input to know if I want to buy it or not.
BTW 9.5 hours isn't just a couple or a handful ... anything over 5 hours is a person putting significant time into the game. Most games that aren't RPGs or Adventure games tend to be 10-20 hours max.
You should know that OP by now depending on how long you've been gaming.
Maybe anything over 5 hours is person putting significant time into game for you but I consider those absolute rookie numbers :D And I still don't consider having played over 5 hours to be anywhere near addiction. When I am addicted I play hundreds of hours, even thousands, tho I really am not into games where you play it through in 10-20 hours and be done with it, I need something to kill massive amounts of time since I got no life. That's why playtime of reviewers matter to me.
Not arguing, just my thoughts. It might be people just play offline but reviews like that are still funny to me.
Sure, some games you can, but others, you can sit there and play it all night, but you’ll exhaust all it has to show within that timeframe.