Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
That would require Ubisoft management to actually know what they're doing. That's more than a little doubtful. *Points at Skull & Bones*
You contact Ubisoft if you want the game on Steam. If you want to wait til Valve does it for you, you'll be waiting a very, very long time.
Look at Valve's new game in alpha, Deadlock.
What's the advantage of that? You'd have to launch the game through their launcher anyway.
It's not like you or anyone here would know that. Keep in mind that no company wants to lose a good opportunity of profit and that's what big games are.
I like to keep my games together. I know I can add non steam games to the library but I also like the terms and agreements of steam. I feel more assured when Valve/steam is involved.
They don't.
Valve has always let developers freely choose to use Steam. They have never gone out and asked developers to put their game on Steam. If the developer wants the game on Steam, then they will put it on Steam.
Steam is more of a market place, where developers and publisher come to sell games, then it as a store that actively finds more products.
There are many market places who have a commercial pro active selling department. They are in the money making business. But I get your point.
You're allowed to invent whatever assurance you like, but the world isn't likely to operate around them.
At some point you either decide to solely use Steam and forgo playing games on other platforms. Or you get used to compromise because the one launcher world ended over a decade ago.
To the point of the topic, Valve has been extremely successful operating its own way. And sometimes people don't stop to think that Valve has been successful because of their decisions and different approaches, and maybe not despite them.
Why impractical. Sure its weird to start a game via Steam which starts a launcher which starts the game. Nothing new here.
They Just dont want to give Steam the 30% :)
I dont even know why anybody wants to Play a Ubisoft Game to be real...