Instalează Steam
conectare
|
limbă
简体中文 (chineză simplificată)
繁體中文 (chineză tradițională)
日本語 (japoneză)
한국어 (coreeană)
ไทย (thailandeză)
български (bulgară)
Čeština (cehă)
Dansk (daneză)
Deutsch (germană)
English (engleză)
Español - España (spaniolă - Spania)
Español - Latinoamérica (spaniolă - America Latină)
Ελληνικά (greacă)
Français (franceză)
Italiano (italiană)
Bahasa Indonesia (indoneziană)
Magyar (maghiară)
Nederlands (neerlandeză)
Norsk (norvegiană)
Polski (poloneză)
Português (portugheză - Portugalia)
Português - Brasil (portugheză - Brazilia)
Русский (rusă)
Suomi (finlandeză)
Svenska (suedeză)
Türkçe (turcă)
Tiếng Việt (vietnameză)
Українська (ucraineană)
Raportează o problemă de traducere
Valve always showcases big new releases. No different than GameStop putting up big ads for new releases on their outside windows to draw in consumers.
Well, it's important to keep in mind that these two things aren't mutually exclusive. They can advertise some games for free, while receiving money to advertise others.
They cant offer a developer to pay for advertising without telling them they can pay for advertising... Again though, what is the evidence? I'm not saying your lying but its a pretty big claim to make without anything to back it up. All you've said is conjecture without a single fact to back it up.
There is far more evidence that Steam doesn't charge for advertising then they do unless you can show the evidence. Now that I tihnk about it its odd that i've seen a few users over the last few weeks keep making these massive claims about steam, yet when asked where their info comes from they keep refusing to ever provide anything to back up their claim.
Something like lying in one document, then being encouraged to do it in another way, would be out side of any NDA and open a company up to a lawsuit.
Occam's razor really does work here. Simplest answer is usually the correct one and making up a theory about "Company is lying to you!" with such obvious holes, is really easy to cut up.
Show us evidence that any game has paid to be advertised on Steam. No leading questions, just evidence.
That would directly contradict the statement that they do not sell marketing space at all and you'd have expected them to be sued by developers for lying to them to get their business, so again, is the claim based on any actual proof, or just what you personally think they do not backed up by any actual evidence?
Well, do you mind answering the question in my previous post?
Well, do you really believe that Valve would be stupid enough to let this kind of evidence leak to the public?
Sure a non disclosure agreement. Now are you aware an NDA does not prevent someone from filing a lawsuit over illegal business practices nor does it prevent someone from testifying in court if their testimony is relevant? NDA's offer no protection from legal action which supersedes the NDA.
Now that I answered your question perhaps you can show some civility and answer the question on what evidence do you have to back up your claim?
So then you have no evidence at all, and your saying the lack of any evidence must be evidence....
Besides the evidence wouldn't need to leak to the public, the game developers would know if they were able to pay Valve for advertising, and they would sue.
Well, you seem to be a rational individual, Spawn. Let me ask you something:
Imagine that you own a building in a big city, New York for example. Would you let companies put signs on your building for free? Like this?
https://cdn.getyourguide.com/img/tour/64c2acb09ef30.jpeg/145.jpg
Thats not a very good comparision. Steam gets money from people buying games on Steam so advertising what THEY think is popular and will get them more sales makes more sense then letting people pay to advertise niche games for instance people won't buy.
So logically for a business like Steam not letting people pay for AD's makes very good sense.
Now do you have any information that contradicts that? Not to mention paid advertisements wouldn't work well with tens of thousands of games. You'd be waiting months for your turn to be advertised if you could pay, or you'd get 12 seconds of advertisement before the next ad switched over.
Well, I'm not sure how people can miss this detail, but if the game developers have an NDA with Valve, they wouldn't be allowed to tell anyone about that.
And in case they do it, it's Valve that would sue them for breaking the NDA.
When did I claim having any evidence?