Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You are not obliged to use Steam, move on or choose another platform.
if the computer can run win7, it can run win10 since they have the same system requirements.
your complaining to the wrong group. if you want support for 7, take it up with MICROSOFT, they are the ones that need to update win7 to get is supported again.
What you're doing is akin to someone throwing a paper airplane into the wind and wondering why it came back at you.
https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/directx/
At least get your facts right: it is not 0.06% but 0.74% (0.06+0.68).
See here: https://store.steampowered.com/hwsurvey/
And if we count in Win 8.1 users too, that gives 0.89% in total.
Because the support for Win 8.1 has ended too, just like for Win 7.
Here's your fix. Now it's time to upgrade.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PCI_passthrough_via_OVMF
I had before a potato pc running win 7 and installed win 10 and oh miracle it was free and running very well on this pc
Most win 7 users against win 10 points are just lies or rumors
Some even seem to like to pretend this is a non-problem. And yet there's been so many threads about this in the past couple of months I've lost count, lots of people are clearly unhappy with it. Valve should've announced their plug pulling at least 2 years ago, 5 would've been a better choice (or you end up with situations like these, that's what the IT industry learned overall).
It's odd how many fail to see the basic problem some people have with this: "I have a box with games on it, I just want to keep playing them, without going into offline mode for ever, it works for me and I paid for these, I just don't wanna touch it". They can roll the dice and see how far it goes, but it'll probably break in time.
I switched to Linux a while back (not new for me, just hasn't been my gaming rig choice before) due to various reasons, but I could also have switched to win10 or 11, but chose not to, simply because:
Win10 and 11 take too much control of your system. I considered switching and changing all the irksome bits, but learned that even if you do so, a few updates later they'll break the changes you made and it's back to square one.
They're near impossible to actually wrangle with and get control back from, because with every odd update they'll break the changes you made and/or introduce something new.
Windows has become a CaaP (customer as a product) leaning OS, with increased focus on tying the user into cloudl services, displaying ads (which some pretend aren't ads) on the start menu, and collecting all sorts of data and telemetry (not to mention the extra leaked by the bundled apps, etc.).
So when people tell others to 'just switch', there's usually a touch of catch-22;
You can stay on Win7, but it'll eventually stop working entirely.
You can switch to win10/11, but if you don't like the data collection you'll just have to put up with that, damned if you do and damned if you don't (no, you can't just mod it away forever).
You can switch to Linux, but you'll have to learn a new OS, and not all games work properly there yet.
Having used linux as a daily driver for decades I'm pretty comfortable with it as a desktop, but as a gaming system it's still lacking, I wouldn't tell someone on Windows to jump ship if they just want to play games and have things working properly out of the box. Sure, proton is great, they've done an amazing job with it, and wine itself has gotten heaps better over the past 20 years, but it doesn't even nearly cover everything yet.
Of course, the writing was on the wall. microsoff stopped supporting win7/8 completely in early 2023, and not long after valve made the announcement. And therein lies the rub - microsoft had warned about this many, many years in advance and reminded people repeatedly that support would be ending. Valve didn't.
So why didn't valve pay attention in class and do the same thing? If the OS maker is ending support in X years, and your user stats and hardware survey data show clearly that lots of people are still using these systems, how about you just start warning people equally early on, and prepare them as thoroughly as microsoff did?
There's a reason MS did it with years advance warnings, they've learned just how much inertia you have to expect from real life scenarios, and that it's unrealistic and naive to work with any other assumption.
So they learned and warned early. Valve didn't pick up on this by now basic wisdom of planning.
If they'd just put two and two together, which they could've done years ago, and announced this properly years ago, there wouldn't be threads like these in 2024.
Expect it to get worse when a Beta releases that will not run on Windows 7... then another when that Beta becomes the released client.
You do not mention that, why the Windows bias!? :)
To be fair, so are some versions of Linux as well. Some may have to upgrade from Ubuntu 16 to Ubuntu 18, at the least, to keep using Steam. As an example, that is. I know it happens, but not what versions.
So even Linux users can't stay on a specific version past a point. It is something that effects ALL OSs.