Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文（簡体字中国語）
繁體中文（繁体字中国語）
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština（チェコ語）
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia（インドネシア語）
Magyar（ハンガリー語）
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português（ポルトガル語－ポルトガル）
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română（ルーマニア語）
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
ルールとガイドライン
この投稿を報告する
xp REQUIRES product key during fresh install, vista, 7, 8 10 11 do not
This is what you don't get. Not supporting something is not the same as forced obsolescence or implementing a kill switch. Not supporting something means that it will no longer be given new features, or will no longer have bugs and security holes fixed, and so on. With the progression of "Google Chrome", EVENTUALLY the Steam Browser would not be able to pick up modern certificates for the same reason the "Firefox" V29 can't log into most sites.
This is not what Valve is doing. Valve is deliberately and directly suspending users' access to THEIR GAMES- not the Steam Community, not the Workshop, not the Store, or anything like that -which is a deliberate denial of people's access to THEIR property THAT THEY ALREADY OWN.
It is that, and ONLY that, which is causing this ruckus. If W7 users were suddenly denied access to the Steam Community, that's one thing and that's fair. W7 users are being locked out of THEIR OWN GAMES.
It's not theft because you sitll own the software licenses and could access them if you upgraded, but it is still a retroactive punishment and a denial of access to things you already own. That can be grounds for a class-action lawsuit, I bet, but no one here wants to hire a lawyer and try.
When I restore a Windows System Image from a full back up because of a hard drive failure, "Windows VII" ALWAYS demands my reactivation. A fresh install through the DVD is different because it just wipes and resets the drive while maintaining the OS.
Dropping support, as you point out with Firefox, also means things will stop working.
That is what Steam is doing except instead of it being slowly phased out, they are cutting it because of the information the clients can access.
You also do not own the games and aren't losing them. They will still be tied to your account.
We are fortunate in that with our technology, we can keep using old systems - whether it be the physical ones, until the hardware dies, or even by making them virtual. Unfortunately, that also leads to the false impression that everything can and should still function even if it is not updated. When we have a lot of components that depend on interoperability to function properly, when one gets updated, that sometimes means that interoperability is lost. This is apparently the case with Chromium.
And I have a whole bunch of software on 5.25" and 3.5" floppies. A lot of it 16 bit and 32 bit programs. I "own" these, yet they are completely unusable on every single one of the 9 PCs that I have around the house, save one. The earliest is from 2004, and the latest is from 2021. That one PC that allows those programs and disks to be used is only in the house because I got lucky dumpster diving ten years ago. It won't last forever, and once it's gone, it will take some time and probably a lot of money to try to procure another system that supports that old tech.
What's causing the ruckus are a handful of people who are grasping at straws and trying to find every excuse in the book to not upgrade to Windows 10/11 or migrate to Linux. This is an entirely self-imposed problem. Hey, I get it. I loved my Windows 98 and Windows XP. If I had my choice, I would still be using them (especially since they do support that old floppy tech). But I also understand it's not the way our technological progress works. And for technology to continue to advance, it can't go on supporting old tech into perpetuity.
Again, any punishment or denial of access is entirely self-imposed. But you are right, no one, even those with the means to do so, want to get up off of the chair and step away from the keyboard to put their money where their mouth is. One thing is for certain, nothing will ever change until someone does so. Who wants to be Heroing Pioneer who stepped up and forced a change that benefited all tech users? ..... No one? ..... Well, we certainly know that pounding keys on the keyboard in a random forum isn't going to change anything, that's for certain.
but anything newer then xp you can install without a cd key, i know from experience from vista to 11
It's a bit different and can't serv as a "legacy" client , all chromium process are still running.
I wonder why so many people asking for a "legacy" client when the current one is just working fine...
Hi biduless,
It is a way to ask this client without browser, and as you know it -no browser was a thing since a few months ago. But it appears that the whole Steam program would go for CEF, not only the browser part. Hence I ask for at least, a reliable offline mode around (with the current version of Steam), to understand if that can be done by Valve for old Os users.
This make sens so , so we can use the current client as it work flawless.
How ? that's the question ;)