will steam be on ps5?

[DarkCrusader]

I don't know if steam will be on ps5 cause I want to be able to play my steam games on ps5.

[xBCxRangers]

引用自 .EteRnal.：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

Not to mention i heard Sony may have a PS2 emulator coming out. I'd buy that i a heartbeat.

Every single post you make is about "anti-consumer" tactics yet you are willing to pay for a game preservation tool when FOSS ones exist?

I am willing to pay anyone who earns my money.

[crunchyfrog]

引用自 xBCxRangers：

引用自 crunchyfrog：

Steam sells PC based games. There's no chance of it being on another platform because the game code is different.

If they appeared there any such games simply would not work on the console. So what's the point?

Stream service.

Which they have absolutely not done yet. So why would anyone consider a totally new thing?

[xBCxRangers]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

Stream service.

Which they have absolutely not done yet. So why would anyone consider a totally new thing?

Idk, because it may make them money, and that stream services are what the future is gonna be?

[crunchyfrog]

引用自 xBCxRangers：

引用自 crunchyfrog：

Which they have absolutely not done yet. So why would anyone consider a totally new thing?

Idk, because it may make them money, and that stream services are what the future is gonna be?

You're missing the point.

I might as well ask will they be selling cakes next, because there's no foundation for it.

It's a stretch and therefore a bit moot.

[xBCxRangers]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

Idk, because it may make them money, and that stream services are what the future is gonna be?

You're missing the point.

I might as well ask will they be selling cakes next, because there's no foundation for it.

It's a stretch and therefore a bit moot.

What i've learned about games, if anything, is never count anything out.

[crunchyfrog]

引用自 xBCxRangers：

引用自 crunchyfrog：

You're missing the point.

I might as well ask will they be selling cakes next, because there's no foundation for it.

It's a stretch and therefore a bit moot.

What i've learned about games, if anything, is never count anything out.

That's a non sequitur.

The point here is you don't understand how it works.

No, the issue here is why would they start doing that when they clearly have no interest when they would do it on their own platform first wouldn't they?

Why would they pay Sony a cut for something new?

[xBCxRangers]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

What i've learned about games, if anything, is never count anything out.

That's a non sequitur.

The point here is you don't understand how it works.

No, the issue here is why would they start doing that when they clearly have no interest when they would do it on their own platform first wouldn't they?

Why would they pay Sony a cut for something new?

I mentioned Xbox earlier, where their MS bonafides, already have us access to Steam, thru Ge Force Now, and is already happening.

Which is to say, Xbox, Sony, Nvidia and others (Shadow etc) are already going to Stream gaming.

Unless Mr Newell feels folks are going to continue to spend thousands of dollars on these clunky PCs, at a time nobody will need them, i feel is impossible to contemplate.

He is going to move, or partner, in the Stream space in the future. No matter what he says today. He has too.

[crunchyfrog]

引用自 xBCxRangers：

引用自 crunchyfrog：

That's a non sequitur.

The point here is you don't understand how it works.

No, the issue here is why would they start doing that when they clearly have no interest when they would do it on their own platform first wouldn't they?

Why would they pay Sony a cut for something new?

I mentioned Xbox earlier, where their MS bonafides, already have us access to Steam, thru Ge Force Now, and is already happening.

Which is to say, Xbox, Sony, Nvidia and others (Shadow etc) are already going to Stream gaming.

Unless Mr Newell feels folks are going to continue to spend thousands of dollars on these clunky PCs, at a time nobody will need them, i feel is impossible to contemplate.

He is going to move, or partner, in the Stream space in the future. No matter what he says today. He has too.

What on earth has that to do with the point?

Outside fixes or mods to get this access is not on Valve's part is it?

So again I ask why would Valve suddenly go into a business they're not interested in, on another platform first?

This demosntrates you don't understand the first thing about this.

[Boblin the Goblin]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

I mentioned Xbox earlier, where their MS bonafides, already have us access to Steam, thru Ge Force Now, and is already happening.

Which is to say, Xbox, Sony, Nvidia and others (Shadow etc) are already going to Stream gaming.

Unless Mr Newell feels folks are going to continue to spend thousands of dollars on these clunky PCs, at a time nobody will need them, i feel is impossible to contemplate.

He is going to move, or partner, in the Stream space in the future. No matter what he says today. He has too.

What on earth has that to do with the point?

Outside fixes or mods to get this access is not on Valve's part is it?

So again I ask why would Valve suddenly go into a business they're not interested in, on another platform first?

This demosntrates you don't understand the first thing about this.

Oh, you have no idea.

[The Presence]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

I mentioned Xbox earlier, where their MS bonafides, already have us access to Steam, thru Ge Force Now, and is already happening.

Which is to say, Xbox, Sony, Nvidia and others (Shadow etc) are already going to Stream gaming.

Unless Mr Newell feels folks are going to continue to spend thousands of dollars on these clunky PCs, at a time nobody will need them, i feel is impossible to contemplate.

He is going to move, or partner, in the Stream space in the future. No matter what he says today. He has too.

What on earth has that to do with the point?

Outside fixes or mods to get this access is not on Valve's part is it?

So again I ask why would Valve suddenly go into a business they're not interested in, on another platform first?

This demosntrates you don't understand the first thing about this.

Oh, this has been going on for a while now. You've been missing out.

[xBCxRangers]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

I mentioned Xbox earlier, where their MS bonafides, already have us access to Steam, thru Ge Force Now, and is already happening.

Which is to say, Xbox, Sony, Nvidia and others (Shadow etc) are already going to Stream gaming.

Unless Mr Newell feels folks are going to continue to spend thousands of dollars on these clunky PCs, at a time nobody will need them, i feel is impossible to contemplate.

He is going to move, or partner, in the Stream space in the future. No matter what he says today. He has too.

What on earth has that to do with the point?

Outside fixes or mods to get this access is not on Valve's part is it?

So again I ask why would Valve suddenly go into a business they're not interested in, on another platform first?

This demosntrates you don't understand the first thing about this.

There is going to be a time, and it happened already, folks were getting access, to every Steam game in their library, thru Xbox and Nvidia. They patched it, but inevitably, all those games and licences are gonna end up in anybodies hands. And it's gonna cost Mr Newell.

And so it's a lot easier to come out with partnerships, or your own services, before people decide to do it for you. Free.

[crunchyfrog]

引用自 xBCxRangers：

引用自 crunchyfrog：

What on earth has that to do with the point?

Outside fixes or mods to get this access is not on Valve's part is it?

So again I ask why would Valve suddenly go into a business they're not interested in, on another platform first?

This demosntrates you don't understand the first thing about this.

There is going to be a time, and it happened already, folks were getting access, to every Steam game in their library, thru Xbox and Nvidia. They patched it, but inevitably, all those games and licences are gonna end up in anybodies hands. And it's gonna cost Mr Newell.

And so it's a lot easier to come out with partnerships, or your own services, before people decide to do it for you. Free.

Which you have failed to demosntrate.

Again go back to my original point. I asked why would Valve go out of their way to do something they've as yet shown no interest in and even spoken on in the past, and suddenly decide to do it on another platform pay extra money, when they could easily do it on their own platform first.

That alone demosntrates you don't know what you're talking about.

Because you clearly don't understand how business works and why it would be stupid to waste money this way, and counter-prodcutive to go to another platform with properitary stuff and try to do it there first.


That's not how Sony work either. They are EXTREMELY protective about access to stuff. I could tell you of loads of tales from when I was a freelance writer the Ofificial Sony magazine.

[xBCxRangers]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

引用自 xBCxRangers：

There is going to be a time, and it happened already, folks were getting access, to every Steam game in their library, thru Xbox and Nvidia. They patched it, but inevitably, all those games and licences are gonna end up in anybodies hands. And it's gonna cost Mr Newell.

And so it's a lot easier to come out with partnerships, or your own services, before people decide to do it for you. Free.

Which you have failed to demosntrate.

Again go back to my original point. I asked why would Valve go out of their way to do something they've as yet shown no interest in and even spoken on in the past, and suddenly decide to do it on another platform pay extra money, when they could easily do it on their own platform first.

That alone demosntrates you don't know what you're talking about.

Because you clearly don't understand how business works and why it would be stupid to waste money this way, and counter-prodcutive to go to another platform with properitary stuff and try to do it there first.


That's not how Sony work either. They are EXTREMELY protective about access to stuff. I could tell you of loads of tales from when I was a freelance writer the Ofificial Sony magazine.

I just told you why. It doesn't take a dissertion dude. If he don't do it, someone is going to do it for him. And so either, he makes money, or loses money. That's up to him.

[crunchyfrog]

引用自 xBCxRangers：

引用自 crunchyfrog：

Which you have failed to demosntrate.

Again go back to my original point. I asked why would Valve go out of their way to do something they've as yet shown no interest in and even spoken on in the past, and suddenly decide to do it on another platform pay extra money, when they could easily do it on their own platform first.

That alone demosntrates you don't know what you're talking about.

Because you clearly don't understand how business works and why it would be stupid to waste money this way, and counter-prodcutive to go to another platform with properitary stuff and try to do it there first.


That's not how Sony work either. They are EXTREMELY protective about access to stuff. I could tell you of loads of tales from when I was a freelance writer the Ofificial Sony magazine.

I just told you why. It doesn't take a dissertion dude. If he don't do it, someone is going to do it for him. And so either, he makes money, or loses money. That's up to him.

And that shows you don't understand.

You're assuming it's just a pool of money to be made.

Reality doesn't work like that. It COSTS money to make money. Again they have commented on this in the past and they don't want to get into it for a number of reasons.

And yet again why would you start it on another platform and WASTE money in royalties first?

Way to dodge all the things I pointed out.

[The Commendatore]

引用自 crunchyfrog：

Way to dodge all the things I pointed out.

That's all he... does.