Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
This is about the dumbest thing about open source software which I've heard in quite a while. Just because the source code is openly available doesn't imply that things are also automatically more safe. Usually quite the contrary even: it's not about the source code being available, but more so about the amount of eyes on it. And how they deal with all that.
https://www.cnet.com/news/privacy/heartburn-from-heartbleed-forces-wide-ranging-rethink-in-open-source-world/
Ever heard of OpenSSL? It's the library used for SSL encryption (also used for visiting encrypted websites) and despite it being the #1 crypto library within the open source (and closed source!) communities a massive exploit in the encryption engine still made its way in.
To add insult to injury the bug was about as dumb as you can imagine: within the randomizer routine in the encryption engine itself, the one area you'd expect to be heavily audited but... nope!
People overlooked this issue for years and the results weren't pretty. Many major ISP's had to fully re-generate their certs because of it, because that's how much OpenSSL was and is being used.
Open source is not a guarantee for more security or safety.
https://github.com/nchristopher/steamdeck-emulation