Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Complain to the game developers/publishers. Valve is not going to force them to stop using them.
And there are no publishers/developers reading anything here.
I think you're making the mistake to think that lots of people actually care about those launchers and use Steam to avoid them. Publishers and Valve have data and information and it certainly wouldn't surprise me when that data will show that the majority does not give a damn. Those games sell, so there is no reason to make a change in that policy for Valve.
Always keep in mind that personal pet peeves are not actually important to businesses.
Today we see social media abused to confuse those using it to believe non-truths.
I encourage people to make their own opinions based on their own experiences, but it all starts from someone pointing it out!
Steam is the 3rd party game launcher for non-Valve games. If you don't like additional launchers when you run a game, buy games directly from the publisher then you'll always be using the game's first party launcher.
Most of your arguments are just straight up ignorance, FUD, and hyperbole. The single launcher world is never coming back. So you'll have to make some decisions about how to proceed in PC gaming as a result.
Some of these game launchers will ask you to create an account outside of steam.
To me the benefit of using steam is you have one account for all your games.
I have had friends on steam, able to install a game but have having lost their 3rd party account access or linked email to recover the account who have lost the game.
Am I really being that unreasonable to ask that Steam could be allowed to manage ALL my steam purchased games and access so I don't need a database of logons?
Since Valve does not sell their games on other stores/launchers on PC, there are no games to add the Steam launcher to.
Tech savvy? I don't have many games on Steam with an additional launcher, but those I do have all close the launcher when I exit the game by default. Though they're Stardock, Kalypso and Paradox games.
Because the owners of those games include them, Valve sees no issue with it and from the looks of it plenty of users also see no issue with it.
Task Manager -> Autostart -> deactivate what you don't need.
Or remove the stuff alltogether via Programs and Features.
IMO we should not be required to run Steam when playing third party programs with their own account binding already. In many cases it's just an additional layer of unneeded DRM which can ♥♥♥♥ with you.
Great if it is seamless and I don't need anther account to logon or invoke another launcher to start it.
Good point regarding not having to rebuild binaries from scratch, but would incremental patching not be possible through steam?
Depends on how you purchase games I suppose. Steam isn't owed some privileged position and doesn't have a monopoly on large catalog of PC games.
Publishers want people to use their launchers, and have decided their launcher is a required part of their games. Developers and publishers are free to make whatever decisions about their games. Valve has long operated and been very successful being developer friendly and not meddling with developer/publisher control of games.
If Valve were to sell their games on other launchers Steam may well be a requirement.
The MS Game Store also includes EA Play if you pay for Game Pass, and that requires you launch EA games through the MS Game Store launcher which then launches the EA launcher. It's the same sort of thing.
If Valve had opinions in line with yours they might have tried forbidding it, and watched as publishers migrate away from Steam. Or perhaps they'd attempt to pay developers to forego the developers launcher. Neither one would be in line with Valve's historical approach to the games industry and other developers.
And again, their developer friendly approach has helped them retain their position. And it's not like this is a new issue either, so one would have to think if Valve was going to move against it we'd have seen something by now.
It being a requirement of the game is reason enough.
If that decision starts costing publishers money maybe they'll change their ways. But good luck convincing gamers as a whole to boycott games with first party launchers. Didn't exactly work when people complained about DLC and micro-transactions. And since first-party launchers have long been normalized it's a little late to have that fight now even if some minority hates the current status quo. Even if some users are willing to fight the good fight, Valve has never shown that interest, so good luck there.
All the arguments you have about the convenience of things revolving solely around Steam, I get it. It would be convenient. I've been using Steam for nearly 18 years. I remember those early days. But they're gone, and there's no way to rewind that clock regardless of how many arguments of convenience you make.