Instalar Steam
iniciar sesión
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chino simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chino tradicional)
日本語 (Japonés)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandés)
български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Danés)
Deutsch (Alemán)
English (Inglés)
Español - España
Ελληνικά (Griego)
Français (Francés)
Italiano
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandés)
Norsk (Noruego)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Portugués de Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portugués - Brasil)
Română (Rumano)
Русский (Ruso)
Suomi (Finés)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Informar de un error de traducción
https://steamcommunity.com/app/1149460/discussions/
Seems the developer's post in their own game's forum. You could always ask there.
Options like DLSS or FidelityFX are typically beyond the scope of system requirements as they enhance the experience further than what is recommended. However, it may still be included because that is what the developer prefers for their intended user experience. I would assume it to be part of a recommended list as opposed to a minimum list, but as I said there is no hard set definition for system requirements.
If I was trying to infer that I would look to see if the minimum required hardware supports DLSS. If the answer is no, then I wouldn't assume the system requirements took DLSS into account.
If the answer is yes, the minimum hardware supports DLSS then it probably doesn't matter one way or the other. The game will either run, or run better than you expect.
The thing about system requirements is that there's no sharp cutoff for what does and doesn't work under what specs. If you can get a game to work, that doesn't necessarily mean it's playable, and what's considered playable is very subjective. I can be happy at low settings, 480p, 20 fps. Someone else may consider that unplayable. Where do we draw the line?