Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
There's two parts here:
1. A gaming has become worse and worse during the last couple years. Doesn't mean there's no great games or great sales, it's just that big name companies don't have them. I do however think "your own fault" if someone insists to stick with big-name A gaming and complains about a lack of good games.
2. You guys really need to take off your rose-tinted glasses. Crappy shovelware has been in existence since the dawn of video games as commercially-viable media. ET single-handedly caused the great video game crash of the 80s and the amount of ♥♥♥♥ I've been sipping through in the 90s at that store which let us playtest 8-Bit cartridges before buying them I can't begin to describe in words. Let's say, Steam's storefront during it's shovelware heyday wasn't shocking.
Now, would I choose to play again the most buggy games of the 90's over the shovelware of copy and paste games we have today?
Sure. I liked those Sierra games. Most of them are true classics even by today standards.
Edit: That's factually false. As someone who has beaten that game as a 6 years old I can assure you it was a great game. Very similar in gameplay and scope to what was actually widely available back then. What caused the crash was stupidity and greed... And the fact that they made a few million cartridge too many for the actual demand.
And I'm not even saying their games are necessarily bad; EA and Ubisoft just isn't my cup of tea anymore. I have thumbed-up stuff from Bandai, Sega, Square-Enix etc. though. Thumbed-down too (EA and Ubisoft are doing "better" there -- if a game doesn't appeal to me then I'm not even buying it, so no thumb-downs). And then there's tons of games, both thumb-ups and thumb-downs, from companies that aren't associated with any of these.
You just have to look outside the glossy brochures handed out by EA & Co. when looking for games, and basically look at the full market, not just a tiny corner of it.
Not really.
First off: it was the (North) American crash. It was caused by low quality games, customers losing trsut in the companies and thus not buying as much, leaving many copies on shelves and thus leading to publishers having to buy back their old games in order to sell the new games and thus losing money en masse. ET is just famous for Atari burying a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ of copies they would never sell in the landscape. Neither was it the worst game, nor anything special in that era.
Golden time is subject, but that depends when the person grew up during said time, as possible they never had the chance to experience period of time before then, as well there subject when certain genre peak for it Golden time, example JRPG peak in the 90s and carry until mid 2000s, then afterwards most became boring, and bland, there some good games, but again find most best during certain times, and if said person actual experience it.
The golden era was in the 90's for two critical reasons: devs were actually making games for the passion they had of making games and sharing said passion with others, not for the sole sake of making games (which usually end up being resumed as a job just to make money). The second reason was the hardware limitation of the machines of the time which greatly pushed those devs into dwelving into originality and profoundly complex gameplay mechanics as a mean to sway customers into buying their games rather than simply focusing on shinnies and graphics. In fact I totally believe that the golden age of PC gaming ended when the focus of games were set on 3D and graphics for the sake of having better graphics over having better games...
That moment when you found a game that you like to play and remember.
Sometimes you find another. You will play that alike. But it will never replace the early ones.
Thats caused by the brain.
Plenty of good EA games outv there if you are actually interested.
It’s pretty much “whatever time I was growing up as a kid and was uncritical of how games worked”
Everyone wants to insist “their” time was the “golden age” and that everything was better through rose tinted glasses