安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
i was one of those that did buy the system. i also knew there used to be Steam computers but i guess that never took off.
Hmmmmmm....
https://www.google.com/search?q=define+obsolete
"1. no longer produced or used; out of date." (for gaming, in this case)
No.
Slightly less terse answer : No more than X-box or PC-gaming made Nintendo "obsolete".
How about the possibility of a 9-tier system where businesses continue to use Windows, while gamers use Steam OS, but businesses also use Steam OS, & gamers also use Windows?
Or people just use whatever they want, whether it be Windows, Steam OS, Mac, some Linux distro, Android, Chromebook, Symbian OS, Temple OS, or some other OS.
Imagine building your next gaming PC out of bread-boards but never installing ANY OS on it.
Instead, you assemble your "world's worst video card" out of a bread-board kit and program Box Boy Calculator into it on EEPROM chips yourself ...if that's what you so choose to do.
You most create another partition just for windows
Or wiped out the steam os and put just windows
The IBM "deal" or copyright case over the PC didn't last long and it was LONG before Windows existed. It was CPM and MS-DOS.
So no, again not true.
The reality is that when Windows came about, version 1 wasn't as widepsread. but by the time 3 came around, it was implemented into business VERY quickly because many of those utiltites like Lotus 123, wordperfect et al worked so well within them and were built upon them.
So ideal for business adoption.
And again, I'm not talking small business here but large industry - banks, hospitals, defence contractors, NASA and so on.
You can't fight that sort of coverage- that's the point.
why does business have to be a determining factor when we buy a phone we buy the one that suits our needs . This is no different when it comes to choosing a operating system for a gaming computer. the average gamer doesn't need the filler that business consumers need. Me as a gamer first i prefer a os that caters to my needs , Steam OS is that Need i can still access many desktop applications that i would use out side of gaming video editing graphics picture etc. but when its time to game it becomes a full console in the form of a pc with added benifits such as controller support thru the steam client plus games run better on steam os then windows so its not a question of if its a question of when ppl realize windows is not for gaming and so why would you pick a operating system that is not made for your specific wants doesn't make good sense
Not happening.
Computers go far beyond gaming, and Steam is not the only marketplace that sells games for PC.
More plausible and realistic would be SteamOS - or more likely Apple - replacing Windows as the largest PC OS system, though chances are still zero for both, in the near future.
Over time, that emulation has improved, and you can expect it to improve even more. However, it's a huge workload, and a moving target.