安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
People will totally complain though. If this were implemented, we'd get the following:
Gallant uploads NSFW images and tags them as such for the benefit of fellow users who don't want to see that kind of thing.
Goofus uploads NSFW images and doesn't tag them at all. Every other day there's a new thread in this forum where someone's naming-and-shaming Goofus and posting 1,000 words about how it's the worst crime in history that they accidentally saw a titty.
Functionally, nothing has changed.
goofus will get a report and a warning firstly...
then a ban if goofus decides to continue not labelling correctly...
and then a longer ban if they continue... i am sure they will decide what
future they want... with posting pic options...
we already do it for the spam and stuff..
"It would only improve things slightly" - the post
full nudity is allowed as long as you don't post actual sex acts. so yeah posting exposed breass and sexually provocative "clothes" is fully allowed, they are supposed to be automatically tagged as nsfw and censored for anyone who who doesn't want to see this sort of crap but the filter constantly fails to tag the right images.
so it's only natural and fair that the uploading users could tag their own stuff as nsfw so we wouldn't have to rely on this unreliable automatic filtering ai
The thing to remember is that this metric is taking into accoutn ALL countries, circumstances, and so on. They are going to be a middle ground.
If YOUR personal morals are adrift from this then maybe, just maybe YOU ought to look into that.
ffs, i have put examples of images that the filter failed to censor. are people blind? it should be obvious to all it's terrible at doing its job.
also, as i said already, if someone honestly belives their images is not sexual i can tolerate it, but not when it simply a cause of a terrible algorithm
Again, nudity is allowed as already explained.
Only straight up porn isn't allowed.
So, unless you can provide evidence of stuff that is normally found on a special website with Hub in it's name... your complaints are invalid instantly.
Again, NSFW is allowed.
You've already been told how to do this - report it and leave them to it. If it is, it'll get fixed. If it ain't nothing will happen. That's the point.
So if it remains the same, then the issue IS as I stated.
The point I'm getting at here is that whenever I see posts like this on here, so many posters think they have the most pure arbitration of what is deemed correct and that simply is impossible.
The fact is, as I said, that Valve has to cater for all countries and circumstances. When you get countries like some of the more religious areas of America they are very out of date and regressive.
So the pouint I'm getting at is to be introspective - ALWAYS hold a mirror up to yourself and think "an I the one with the off normal perspective".
looks like i have to repeat myself once again:
A. report function barely works, it sometimes takes literal DAYS until the sexual image gets censored.
B. a proper filter is supposed to work in the way that i wouldn't have to deal with sexual images that i need reporting. it's supposed to be used for rare abuse cases, not for the masses of NSFW images that get passed the broken filter.
C. there is not a single good reason why allowing users to tag their uploads shouldn't happen, it's a feature that hurts no one and gives control to actual people and not a literally braindead program.
peoplel ike you who are against it must be either contrarian or spiteful against everyone who hates sexual imagery
If you can't bother acknowledging people pointing out your incorrect assumptions about nudity, then everything you say is literally fruit of the poisonous tree.
Please don't try to fight nudity like this.
It will backfire cataclysmicaly
the NSFW filter exists for a reason. just becaise posting NSFW images is allowed doesn't mean it shouldn't be filtered when i intentionally ticked all the possible filter options.
as i said before, the problem is that the NSFW filter DOES NOT WORK. im getting realy sick of repeating myself.
the clear solution is obvious - allow users to tag their own uploads as NSFW to compensate for the automatic filter's deffectiveness. there is literally no downside to this and yet here you are throwing vague warnings at me that it will somehow horribly backfire on me.
wtf is wrong with half the people here?
That's why people are resisting you.
Be like what Al Capone said, "You can do more with a kind word and a gun, than a kind word alone."
You just need to work on the kind word first. :P
Also, you catch more flies with honey than vinegar, etc.
The point being, people are inherently lazy, and very few people would check the box labeling something as NSFW.
Don't look at me, it's literally human nature.
2) while it may seem like a good solution to just mark stuff manually as nsfw, steam staff do not care to moderate screenshots or artwork. you can report content for being posted in the wrong sections but nothing will happen. people regularly use steam as their personal image share, you see it all the time. for this reason i don't know why you'd even look through the general 'artwork' section as it's 99.9% not game artwork.
3) even if steam did care to moderate it, they can't be trusted to do it fairly and indiscriminately.