安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
- There aren't that many AAA studios.
- Those studios don't release that many games in a year.
Here's just a tiny example: It's really difficult to get quick support for games that are Epic exclusives. You better hope there's an active Reddit sub or the devs have a proper modded forum or there's an active discord otherwise you're kinda screwed in the support department.
Steam games, however, especially new ones, have the benefit of active communities that provide support; you don't have to wait on the dev for troubleshooting advice or workarounds. Heck, it's pretty common for console gamers to look for game advice in the Steam discussion sections. It happened during both the NMS and Cyberpunk dramas - the system just works. Users like the (active) accessibility of certain "functions" Steam provides and that's as important as the games.
Anyway, I'd guess most gamers use a combo of Steam, Epic, GOG, Humble Bundle, Greenman Gaming and whatever is in the Gamestop/Game/Best Buy bargain bin.
Here's a conspiracy theory for people:
Epic isn't actually trying to "kill Steam". They are just in for their own slice of the pie. Inconceivable, I know.
Not really, they are just pocketing money from Epic and then still releasing on Steam. Also many publishers like Uplay, bethesda, etc try to sell on their own store to avoid paying ANYONE a commission.
That isn't anyone steering away from Steam, quite the opposite as is shown by EA RETURNING to steam
I kinda said that...hence the quotes and the last line...
Shocking I know!
The one thing you miss. Exclusives on Epic are released on Steam for half price and have benefited from patching, bug fixes etc.
Why buy now when you can buy later.
Epic seems to be doing just fine, though. Oh I'm sure it's going to "crash and burn" because of "its unsustainable business model", and that's going to happen "any minute now".
Just like the Rapture is always coming, this time for real.
Heck they even did the free game give away thing. But they eventually stopped.
EA doesn't seem to be doing badly, either.
Eh Epic confirmed a while back they were operating at a loss due to having to pay for exclusives. So far their sales numbers haven't really improved so no they really aren't doing good at all with the store.
They have been tapping into Fortnite money to keep the store alive, and Fortnite itself is making them far less money now then it was a year or two ago as well. So I wouldn't consider that doing fine.
The only reason the store isn't out of business is they are keeping it afloat.
Heaven forbid the status quo ever change...
Valve has done pretty well for themselves in how the treat publishers. Everyone who's spinning their tires that it's not 2011 anymore needs to relax. There's plenty of games on Steam, and there's plenty of AAA games being released on Steam. Steam will do just fine without a virtual monopoly on releases.
If you need to play a game on Epic that badly, go make an Epic account and buy it. It's not a crime. Pitching a fit that a game isn't on Steam doesn't mean Valve has some sort of problem it needs to address. No matter what Valve does, the industry will still evolve, and publishers will try different things from time to time. Desperately trying to prevent change is futile and counter-productive.
Except business was soaring for EA. There never was a need to "come back to Steam". Steam simply was an untapped market. And you can't have this is you goal is to make all the moneys.
EA -Fifa FUT money.
Remove both and you have a clearer idea of how each are doing.