此主题已被锁定
Why doesn't Steam get the platinum trophy from PS for getting all achievements for many games?
I noticed quite a few games I have are missing the achievement that is unlocked when you unlock all other achievements, referred to as "platinum" trophy on PlayStation.

Not that this really matters since I'm not an achievement hunter anyway, but it just seems weird that developers go out of their way to remove an achievement for Steam.

Just to name a few games I have that don't have this ultimate achievement:
- Resident evil 2 and 3 remake
- Hitman reboot games
- Dishonored games
- AC Odyssey and Origin
最后由 Dweller Beyond the Threshold 编辑于; 2021 年 8 月 9 日 下午 6:12
引用自 Timoh:
The 'platinum achievement' isn't implemented by the dev themselves, it is part of the PS dev framework. If all other achievements are unlocked, it is automatically being triggered, which means no additional dev work.

For Steam the logic of this achievement has to be implemented by the devs themselves, which is why it doesn't exist for most titles.

< >
正在显示第 46 - 60 条,共 61 条留言
crunchyfrog 2021 年 8 月 25 日 下午 12:42 
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
引用自 crunchyfrog
Yes I KNOW that. I was merely pointing out this particular hurdle that might lay in their path.

You do understand how conversations work, right? Just because I was responding to your point, it does NOT mean I am directly addressing your EXACT point. One can embellish. I thought I made that abundantly clear.

And he WAS saying what I said.
Sure, you are allowed to deviate my topic of "Why devs don't make an extra achievement on steam to mirror same list of trophy on PS" to "the issue of platinum being copyrighted", but if you look back at your first reply to me, you were saying that I was missing your point. I never missed your point, it was simply never the topic I was talking about. So you singlehandedly dragged me into an irrelevant topic I never wanted to argue about and you act like a surprised pikachu when I don't see the relevance of your arguments because it has nothing to do with some devs not putting an extra effort to make one more trophy when others do?

So let's just acknowledge each other's point and move on.
- I'm saying that it would be great if all devs could do what some devs are doing, by making an extra achievement that unlocks when all achievements are umlocked.
- you are saying that the system where a trophy pops up automatically once all other trophies are unlocked is a sony exclusive, potentially copyrighted feature.

There you go. There is exactly zero conflict between both statements, they are just talking about different aspects.
Well if that's the case fair enough.

But if I said you were missing the point, then you clearly worded it it as if you were tackling my point rather than embellishing or saying otherwise, weren't you?

This smacks of wriggling.
Timoi 2021 年 8 月 26 日 上午 2:06 
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
Sure, you are allowed to deviate my topic of "Why devs don't make an extra achievement on steam to mirror same list of trophy on PS" to "the issue of platinum being copyrighted", but if you look back at your first reply to me, you were saying that I was missing your point. I never missed your point, it was simply never the topic I was talking about. So you singlehandedly dragged me into an irrelevant topic I never wanted to argue about and you act like a surprised pikachu when I don't see the relevance of your arguments because it has nothing to do with some devs not putting an extra effort to make one more trophy when others do?

引用自 UnhappyLawbro
I was only really just curious in the beginning why different games had different achievement list when it was the same on PS. Now I know why :)

I agree that there is no conflict between the 2, but that is because they complete each other. The fact that the platinum trophies are part of how the PS ecosystem works and could be under copyright/trademark/patent IS the reason why the achievement is missing when the devs just port over the same achievement list. It's not deviating the conversation to an irrelevant topic... It is the main part of the full answer to your question... Without that information, it would make no sense that devs need to create this new achievement manually when they can just port over the rest of the trophy list to achievements.
引用自 Timoi
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
Sure, you are allowed to deviate my topic of "Why devs don't make an extra achievement on steam to mirror same list of trophy on PS" to "the issue of platinum being copyrighted", but if you look back at your first reply to me, you were saying that I was missing your point. I never missed your point, it was simply never the topic I was talking about. So you singlehandedly dragged me into an irrelevant topic I never wanted to argue about and you act like a surprised pikachu when I don't see the relevance of your arguments because it has nothing to do with some devs not putting an extra effort to make one more trophy when others do?

引用自 UnhappyLawbro
I was only really just curious in the beginning why different games had different achievement list when it was the same on PS. Now I know why :)

I agree that there is no conflict between the 2, but that is because they complete each other. The fact that the platinum trophies are part of how the PS ecosystem works and could be under copyright/trademark/patent IS the reason why the achievement is missing when the devs just port over the same achievement list. It's not deviating the conversation to an irrelevant topic... It is the main part of the full answer to your question... Without that information, it would make no sense that devs need to create this new achievement manually when they can just port over the rest of the trophy list to achievements.
yeah if he was the first one to answer my thread with this response, it would have been great because I did not know this was the case. However, someone before already told me that this isn't how it works, and told me that it's some devs who decide to go an extra mile to put an extra achievement on Steam as opposed to removing one for Steam when they port over the trophy from PS4.
So yes, when he brought up that point, I already moved on. Plus he kept saying how I was missing his point which made things even more confusing. He started talking about the copyright aspect of the platinum system when I never asked for Steam to have a similar feature, it is not that related to the question of why not all devs make an extra achievement because this is not copyrightable.
最后由 Dweller Beyond the Threshold 编辑于; 2021 年 8 月 26 日 上午 9:12
crunchyfrog 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 1:43 
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
引用自 Timoi



I agree that there is no conflict between the 2, but that is because they complete each other. The fact that the platinum trophies are part of how the PS ecosystem works and could be under copyright/trademark/patent IS the reason why the achievement is missing when the devs just port over the same achievement list. It's not deviating the conversation to an irrelevant topic... It is the main part of the full answer to your question... Without that information, it would make no sense that devs need to create this new achievement manually when they can just port over the rest of the trophy list to achievements.
yeah if he was the first one to answer my thread with this response, it would have been great because I did not know this was the case. However, someone before already told me that this isn't how it works, and told me that it's some devs who decide to go an extra mile to put an extra achievement on Steam as opposed to removing one for Steam when they port over the trophy from PS4.
So yes, when he brought up that point, I already moved on. Plus he kept saying how I was missing his point which made things even more confusing. He started talking about the copyright aspect of the platinum system when I never asked for Steam to have a similar feature, it is not that related to the question of why not all devs make an extra achievement because this is not copyrightable.

Well, again, that;s because you don't understand how conversations work.

These are DISCUSSION forums. Just because I offered and agreed with a previous answer, yet as you ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGED, I embellished on the point, that is perfectly fine.

I don't understand your strange backpedddling and goalpost moving though. JUst go with it. There's no e-peen ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ here.
引用自 crunchyfrog
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
yeah if he was the first one to answer my thread with this response, it would have been great because I did not know this was the case. However, someone before already told me that this isn't how it works, and told me that it's some devs who decide to go an extra mile to put an extra achievement on Steam as opposed to removing one for Steam when they port over the trophy from PS4.
So yes, when he brought up that point, I already moved on. Plus he kept saying how I was missing his point which made things even more confusing. He started talking about the copyright aspect of the platinum system when I never asked for Steam to have a similar feature, it is not that related to the question of why not all devs make an extra achievement because this is not copyrightable.

Well, again, that;s because you don't understand how conversations work.

These are DISCUSSION forums. Just because I offered and agreed with a previous answer, yet as you ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGED, I embellished on the point, that is perfectly fine.

I don't understand your strange backpedddling and goalpost moving though. JUst go with it. There's no e-peen ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ here.
Mate I don't understand what is your problem. I already said I acknowledged your point, what more are you trying to prove?

When have I backpaddled or moved the goalpost? I literally made it clear in my first reply to you that I was talking about something different from you. Sure, you are allowed to say anything you want in my thread, this is a free discussion board. But you need to STOP replying to me and forcing me to converse with you when I have made abundantly clear that I'm NOT INTERESTED in your discussion about COPYRIGHT since it has nothing to do with my current question about individual dev's work.

You are the one who doesn't understand how conversations work. It takes 2 WILLING PARTIES to engage in a conversation. I don't want to talk about your topic, so stop bothering me. You forcing me to keep talking about something doesn't make it a conversation, it's called harassment.
最后由 Dweller Beyond the Threshold 编辑于; 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 2:43
crunchyfrog 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 2:53 
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
引用自 crunchyfrog

Well, again, that;s because you don't understand how conversations work.

These are DISCUSSION forums. Just because I offered and agreed with a previous answer, yet as you ALREADY ACKNOWLEDGED, I embellished on the point, that is perfectly fine.

I don't understand your strange backpedddling and goalpost moving though. JUst go with it. There's no e-peen ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ here.
Mate I don't understand what is your problem. I already said I acknowledged your point, what more are you trying to prove?

When have I backpaddled or moved the goalpost? I literally made it clear in my first reply to you that I was talking about something different from you. Sure, you are allowed to say anything you want in my thread, this is a free discussion board. But you need to STOP replying to me and forcing me to converse with you when I have made abundantly clear that I'm NOT INTERESTED in your discussion about COPYRIGHT since it has nothing to do with my current question about individual dev's work.

You are the one who doesn't understand how conversations work. It takes 2 WILLING PARTIES to engage in a conversation. I don't want to talk about your topic, so stop bothering me. You forcing me to keep talking about something doesn't make it a conversation, it's called harassment.

I do not have a problem. I do have consideration for all readers, now and in future.

And so, I'm entitled to offer summary and explanantions on what's gone on to make it clear, am I not?

For the love of the lord god John Lennon, stop taking this so damned personally. I don't care for immature epeen stuff.

最后由 crunchyfrog 编辑于; 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 2:53
引用自 crunchyfrog
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
Mate I don't understand what is your problem. I already said I acknowledged your point, what more are you trying to prove?

When have I backpaddled or moved the goalpost? I literally made it clear in my first reply to you that I was talking about something different from you. Sure, you are allowed to say anything you want in my thread, this is a free discussion board. But you need to STOP replying to me and forcing me to converse with you when I have made abundantly clear that I'm NOT INTERESTED in your discussion about COPYRIGHT since it has nothing to do with my current question about individual dev's work.

You are the one who doesn't understand how conversations work. It takes 2 WILLING PARTIES to engage in a conversation. I don't want to talk about your topic, so stop bothering me. You forcing me to keep talking about something doesn't make it a conversation, it's called harassment.

I do not have a problem. I do have consideration for all readers, now and in future.

And so, I'm entitled to offer summary and explanantions on what's gone on to make it clear, am I not?

For the love of the lord god John Lennon, stop taking this so damned personally. I don't care for immature epeen stuff.
If you didn't care you would have stopped whining about this now. I wanted to drop this conversation after I openly acknowledged your position and moved on, but you just had to come back and argue more.
How about you actually show some maturity by dropping this issue and leave my thread?
最后由 Dweller Beyond the Threshold 编辑于; 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 3:28
crunchyfrog 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 3:24 
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
引用自 crunchyfrog

I do not have a problem. I do have consideration for all readers, now and in future.

And so, I'm entitled to offer summary and explanantions on what's gone on to make it clear, am I not?

For the love of the lord god John Lennon, stop taking this so damned personally. I don't care for immature epeen stuff.
If you didn't care you would have stopped whining about this now. I wanted to drop this conversation after I openly acknowledged your position and moved on, but you just had to come back and argue more.
How about you actually show some maturity by dropping this issue and leave my thread?
Because it isn't your thread. That is not how it works here.

Again, you keep making some weird errors.

I WILL keep responding if you keep bringing me up or addressing things I say. That's how it works, especially when you get it wrong.

I'll happily leave it once this happens.
引用自 crunchyfrog
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
If you didn't care you would have stopped whining about this now. I wanted to drop this conversation after I openly acknowledged your position and moved on, but you just had to come back and argue more.
How about you actually show some maturity by dropping this issue and leave my thread?
Because it isn't your thread. That is not how it works here.

Again, you keep making some weird errors.

I WILL keep responding if you keep bringing me up or addressing things I say. That's how it works, especially when you get it wrong.

I'll happily leave it once this happens.
Ok please enlighten me as to what I got wrong.
crunchyfrog 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 3:30 
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
引用自 crunchyfrog
Because it isn't your thread. That is not how it works here.

Again, you keep making some weird errors.

I WILL keep responding if you keep bringing me up or addressing things I say. That's how it works, especially when you get it wrong.

I'll happily leave it once this happens.
Ok please enlighten me as to what I got wrong.
Already explained in previous answers, where I explained otherwise. Not going over it again. You can simply roll back to every response. You agreed to some of them so you know full well.

Again, this is all done for the purpose of the reader. I have no reason to regurgitate that.
引用自 crunchyfrog
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
Ok please enlighten me as to what I got wrong.
Already explained in previous answers, where I explained otherwise. Not going over it again. You can simply roll back to every response. You agreed to some of them so you know full well.

Again, this is all done for the purpose of the reader. I have no reason to regurgitate that.
LOL nice way to dodge my question because you just can't prove it.
We both agreed that you and I were talking about different issues. In fact, I never even accused you of saying anything wrong, just not what I was talking about.
crunchyfrog 2021 年 8 月 26 日 下午 3:34 
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
引用自 crunchyfrog
Already explained in previous answers, where I explained otherwise. Not going over it again. You can simply roll back to every response. You agreed to some of them so you know full well.

Again, this is all done for the purpose of the reader. I have no reason to regurgitate that.
LOL nice way to dodge my question because you just can't prove it.
We both agreed that you and I were talking about different issues. In fact, I never even accused you of saying anything wrong, just not what I was talking about.

Proof is right there in previous responses.

NOw I'm done with your silliness. Unless you have something new to offer, I;m done as the issue has been sorted.
引用自 crunchyfrog
引用自 UnhappyLawbro
LOL nice way to dodge my question because you just can't prove it.
We both agreed that you and I were talking about different issues. In fact, I never even accused you of saying anything wrong, just not what I was talking about.

Proof is right there in previous responses.

NOw I'm done with your silliness. Unless you have something new to offer, I;m done as the issue has been sorted.
Thank god. FINALLY. You will not be missed XD
Steel Bear 2023 年 9 月 26 日 下午 8:37 
Because Platinum is meaningless at the end of the day. Even on PlayStation some games don't have a Plat.
And Platinum doesn't mean you've got all the achievements. Sure, the DLCs aren't needed for Platinum (which is kinda based ngl), but then even some base game stuff doesn't count. For example I have a Plat in Horizon Forbidden West, but I don't have all the New Game+ achievements, which is a part of the base game, so why do I have a trophy for getting all the trophies when I didn't get them all?
And there's also the inconsistency : sometimes multiplayer trophies are separate, sometimes not, sometimes it's a combination of both.
And it gets more confusing for re-releases. For example DmC Devil May Cry Definitive Edition for PS4 - you buy the base game with its DLC, can't separate them, and all the trophies are part of the base game. But then there is The Last of Us Remastered - same story, DLCs included automatically, but the DLC trophies are separate and aren't needed for the Plat, despite being inseparable on PS4.
So yeah, Platinum Trophy is a nothing trophy
Flywolf 2024 年 11 月 21 日 上午 1:24 
I was trying to google topics on whether ps5 trophy systems are copyrighted and I got redirected to this thread. As a lawyer, I can't resist but finishing reading all the arguments here lol.
< >
正在显示第 46 - 60 条,共 61 条留言
每页显示数: 1530 50

发帖日期: 2021 年 8 月 9 日 下午 6:10
回复数: 61