安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
此主題已被鎖定 
. 
討論區規矩與守則
檢舉此篇文章
i expect older games to have better discounts... thats it...
maybe not the games i want to buy but older games in general...
i wont be groomed other wise.... so have fun...
you can win... thats great you win... done
Nope. Subjective through-and-through.
List the objective criteria that apply.
That aside, I note the verb “to expect” keeps coming up in your posts. What relevance is there in what any particular person expects? Why ought anyone else care?
If I were to state: “I expect you to agree with my argument; I made it years ago” it would neither be a realistic expectation nor would it be objectively valid to do so after any length of time.
The data shows that across the board the sales do marginally improve year on year.
But we also have clear evidence that gamers DO indeed suffer from the fact that as they buy more games and have less of a pool to wish for, it makes them jaded and they blame everyone except themselves.
That's clearly demonstrable.
You can expect all you like, doesn't make it so.
Traditionally in the olden days of physical games, and even when digital had started, the longer a game had been out the lesser the price charged. But it's either missing the point or disingenious to expect it to stay that way - simply because digital dostrbution has changed that, games as a service exist, and games have FAR longer legs than previously.
You only have to look at games like 7 Days to Die or GTA V - those games came out around the beginning of the LAST generation and yet are still selling strongly. What sort of business sense would it be to reduce the price just because "it used to be that way"?
That's terrible economics.
At least for legit sites as you cannot compare to black market sites that are reselling stolen keys.
That's because you seem to be making the flawed assumption that Valve set the prices - they CANNOT. They are a store and only can sell at the price the rights owners state.
So that's why the prices look similar - it ain't their remit.
Agree with this a 100% it baffles me how anyone can be blind to this!
If there is no sequel for instance that causes little reason to buy the original game if there is no major link to the newer version as there is no cost really to selling you game on a digital store unlike a physical store where there is limited space.
Or if the game is still selling very well there is no reason to reduce it's price.
And again if the game is available on your own launcher it makes sense to sell it on others for more to drive people to use your launcher as so many others have been launched in the past decade compared to when only steam was an option.
Just because a digital item may be older does not automatically make it of less value like physical goods can be if they have been replaced with a better version or with wear and tear.
Agree with some of what you are saying but you must remember Steam makes a massive commission which could quite easily be passed on to the customers in terms of coupons etc.
I regularly monitor ITAD and many of the games in discussion have actually been cheaper at somepoint preceeding this so called 'sale' not to mention that they are far cheaper in most instances from 3rd party resellers like Voidu, Greenman etc
You can call it what you want but I'll stand firm with my opinion that the sales over last 3 years or so have lost their appeal to me in terms of lack of big record low discounts and no offer of even a £5 measly coupon!
I normally spend anything between £150-200 a sale in the past because like most people I love a bargain but if the games have been out many years have seen cheaper prices before and is available cheaper elsewhere then it's a no brainer and this year I only spent £30 with steam as the lack of 50% or more discounts on good but 3-5 year old games that I didn't own was pretty much non existent.
2x a year with a total of 4 weeks.